January 10, 2003 - Russia Far East listserv: Peace Corps to depart Russia within 90 days
Peace Corps Online:
Peace Corps News:
Headlines:
Peace Corps Headlines - 2003:
01 January 2003 Peace Corps Headlines:
January 10, 2003 - Russia Far East listserv: Peace Corps to depart Russia within 90 days
Peace Corps to depart Russia within 90 days
Read and comment on this message from the Russia Far East listserv that says that the 90 days clause applies to the Peace Corps in Russia and the PC Office must be completely closed down by March 30, 2003.
As such, on March 15th, the Peace Corps will send notice to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Education that all Peace Corps Volunteers will be out of Russia. In sum, all Volunteers must leave Russia by the 15th of February as no visa extensions will be granted.
Read the story at:
Here it is straight from the PC Office here in Vladivostok:*
* This link was active on the date it was posted. PCOL is not responsible for broken links which may have changed.
Here it is straight from the PC Office here in Vladivostok:
The 90 days clause applies and the PC Office must be completely closed down by March 30, 2003. This means that all volunteers must leave sooner to close out the office. So PC RFE has scheduled our COS Conference for February 8-11, 2003 here in Vlad.
As such, on March 15th, the Peace Corps will send notice to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Education that all Peace Corps Volunteers will be out of Russia. In sum, we must leave Russia by the 15th of February as no visa extensions will be granted.
So there it is in a nutshell. We have our answer. I think I speak for many of us here in the Far East (and perhaps in the Western Russia Program as well?) when I say we are quite relieved. No emergency 24 hour evacuations, but a month to plan our departures. All in all, I for one, am at peace with it all.
I want to thank everyone for all their support through this mess. Again, I am simply relieved that we have our answer and can begin to arrange our lives.
Wishing you all the best from the Russian Far East-
Background on the Peace Corps in Russia
Read more background on the Peace Corps in Russia at:
Special Report: From Russia with Love 1 January 2003
PC Rep won't waste words on spying charges
Peace Corps' Man in Moscow won't waste words on the spying charges 5 January 2003
Peace Corps responds to Russian Allegations
Peace Corps responds to Russian suggestions of intelligence gathering 3 January 2003
Peace Corps disappointed with Russian decision
Exclusive: Peace Corps disappointed with Russian decision 27 December 2002
Moscow to abandon Peace Corps agreement
New York Times: Russia bars future U.S. Peace Corps workers 28 December 2002
Pravda: Moscow informs Washington of intention to abandon Peace Corps agreement 27 December 2002
Associated Press: Russia Rejects U.S. Peace Corps 27 December 2002
US Ready to Remove Peace Corps From Russia
U.S. Ready to Remove Peace Corps From Russia, Citing Disputes 17 December 2002
Russian Spy claims "groundless" says US
Russian claims about Peace Corps volunteers "groundless" says US Embassy 16 December 2002
KGB accuses PCVs of "suspicious activities"
Update: KGB Chief says PCVs involved in suspicious activities 15 December 2002
KGB chief accuses Peace Corps workers of spying in Russia 15 December 2002
KGB refuses visas to religious workers
Russia refuses visas to religious workers 2 November 2002
What RPCVs say about the situation
Exclusive: Read the advice RPCVs gave the Peace Corps in August 18 August 2002
Russia is cooling to the Peace Corps
Time Magazine says Russia "Cooling To the Corps" 23 August 2002
Radio Free Europe makes the Case for the Peace Corps in Russia 18 August 2002
Secretary of State Powell makes no progress on Peace Corps visas with Russian foreign minister 14 August 2002
Russia refuses visas for Peace Corps Volunteers
Peace Corps Moscow chief denies allegations of non-professionalism 13 August 2002
Russia Ousting Dozens Of Peace Corps Volunteers 12 August 2002
Click on a link below for more stories on PCOL
Some postings on Peace Corps Online are provided to the individual members of this group without permission of the copyright owner for the non-profit purposes of criticism, comment, education, scholarship, and research under the "Fair Use" provisions of U.S. Government copyright laws and they may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owner. Peace Corps Online does not vouch for the accuracy of the content of the postings, which is the sole responsibility of the copyright holder.
This story has been posted in the following forums: : Headlines; COS - Russia
PCOL1888
08
.
One billion people have no access to clean water and two billion are without sanitation services. Countless lives around the world are also undermined by lack of quality health care, education and other public services.
· The World Bank wants citizens to behave more like consumers, and believes that if they do so their public services will improve. Critics believe more participatory democracy would offer better alternatives.
· The World Bank thinks privatisation offers solutions, while critics point to evidence that poor people often pay more for worse services as a result.
· The World Bank thinks unproductive public workers should be disciplined more, while their unions think they should be supported and involved more.
These issues are currently being debated on the World Bank's website in an electronic discussion independently moderated by Public World, a London-based organisation with many years experience of criticising World Bank public services policy and developing innovative alternatives.
The World Bank is hosting this discussion because its World Development Report, 2004, 'Making Services Work for Poor People', is focused on these issues. But you do not need to read the draft report to have knowledge, opinions and information that could contribute to the debate and influence international policy.
What do you think about privatisation? What do you think about charging people more for their health care? What can be done to get more teachers into rural areas?
These and many more themes have already attracted well-informed and incisive contributions from all over the world. To read them, and post your own comment if you wish, please visit www.publicworld.org and follow the links.
