|By Ann T. Hannibal (cache-ra07.proxy.aol.com - 188.8.131.52) on Wednesday, April 07, 2004 - 5:08 pm: Edit Post|
Pres. Bush is the most, honorable, moral and has the most resolve to do what ever is right for our great country. Please vote for him again in Nov. We cannot afford a flip-floppy for pres.now or ever!
|By Terese Condon (184.108.40.206) on Wednesday, April 07, 2004 - 5:40 pm: Edit Post|
Is it honorable to lie to the American people? Is it moral to go to war againt a country that has not attack the US? Is it not up to the American people to decide what is right for our country? We need to ensure that we keep free speach for the radio waves to do this. Is not the ememy al Qaeda not a specific country? I know it is easier to attack a country but that is not moral. Is it moral to start a "holy war" a "crusade"?
Enlighten me please.
|By William Grothus (cache-mtc-aa07.proxy.aol.com - 220.127.116.11) on Wednesday, April 07, 2004 - 10:22 pm: Edit Post|
Bush supports life, Kerry does not. It is that simple.
William M. Grothus, RPCV, Philippines
|By Reagan Dem (adsl-32-85-249.mem.bellsouth.net - 18.104.22.168) on Thursday, April 08, 2004 - 11:48 am: Edit Post|
"Bush supports life" ??????
Come on! Turn off the Fox News, wake up, and look what's going on around you!
Dubya in no way deserves to be called a "war president," which by the way he says with so much pride and a silly sh-t eating grin that it makes any comparison to him with those chimps scary. War is no frat party--ask Kerry. While Kerry was in 'Nam getting shrapnel and dodging bullets, Dubya, our fortunate son, was AWOL in Bama getting sauced. Same for Rummy, Cheney, and Wolfowitz--who talk the talk but have never walked in formation.
Seriously, Dubya does not deserve to be Commander-in-chief, responsible for the lives of our nation's youth. The closest he has come to war was almost a year ago when he played Ice-man (or Maverick or Goose or whatever TopGun character he imagines himself to be) for a day to declare "Mission Accomplished."
Kerry knows what war is about, he spilled his own blood for the country, saw the mistake Vietnam had become, and began to speak out against it. Flip-floppy? Or enlightenment? Only a Kerry presidency can mitigate the economic-diplomatic-military quagmire we find ourselves sinking into. Thank you Dubya!!!!
|By Username (22.214.171.124) on Friday, April 09, 2004 - 10:41 am: Edit Post|
Too bad "Reagan Dem" can't express theirself without losing control
|By MisterRogers (cpe-024-165-161-120.midsouth.rr.com - 126.96.36.199) on Saturday, April 10, 2004 - 3:09 pm: Edit Post|
...Unfortunately our president cannot express himself without losing control--of his dipthongs. Can you say "nuclear?" Say > or >... it's not that hard...I know you can ;)
|By William Burke (cache-ntc-aa03.proxy.aol.com - 188.8.131.52) on Saturday, April 17, 2004 - 8:49 pm: Edit Post|
"Turn off Fox news [and ]wake up." I like that. Bush's honesty is certainly debatable, but it has mortal consequences. One of his scariest honest moments is his inability to name a single mistake he has made as president. Is that a deliberate lie, a massive self-deceit, or an honest incomprehension of his record. Bill Burke, Nigeria '63-65
|By Anonymous (cache-mtc-aa07.proxy.aol.com - 184.108.40.206) on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 - 12:12 am: Edit Post|
is it fair that one guy walks around in a suit and tie and dosent even know how to give a speach how he ever got to be pres. ill never know and all those poor young men getting killed over there only because he says so.these guys get in only cause they got a ton of money.get a good man in there with brains not money