August 8, 2005: Headlines: Figures: COS - Swaziland: Journalism: Television: Military: Safety and Security of Volunteers: MSNBC Hardball: Chris Matthews (RPCV Swaziland) discusses alternatives to military service on "Hardball"

Peace Corps Online: Peace Corps News: Special Reports: August 2, 2005: Headlines: Speaking Out: Military: Intelligence Issues: Washington Post: Peace Corps Option for Military Recruits Sparks Concerns : Hardball Transcript: RPCV Chris Matthews leads the debate on the Peace Corps and the Military Option on Hardball : August 8, 2005: Headlines: Figures: COS - Swaziland: Journalism: Television: Military: Safety and Security of Volunteers: MSNBC Hardball: Chris Matthews (RPCV Swaziland) discusses alternatives to military service on "Hardball"

By Admin1 (admin) ( - on Monday, August 08, 2005 - 11:59 pm: Edit Post

Chris Matthews (RPCV Swaziland) discusses alternatives to military service on "Hardball"

Chris Matthews (RPCV Swaziland) discusses alternatives to military service on Hardball

"I was over there and a guy came up. I was kidding around with a friend of mine over there in Swazi. And I said, you know, of course, I'm CIA, laughing. He says, never joke about that. That's not funny. And here's a guy that thought the pope was in London. He didn‘t know much about the Western world. But he knew the CIA was bad. And isn‘t it the same problem?"

Television Journalist Chris Matthews served as a Peace Corps Volunteer in Swaziland in the 1960's.

Chris Matthews (RPCV Swaziland) discusses alternatives to military service on "Hardball"

Peace Corps alternative to military service

How will this change affect the organization's standing worldwide?


Updated: 8:30 p.m. ET Aug. 8, 2005

Chris Matthews
Host of 'Hardball'
Since it’s founding in 1961, the U.S. Peace Corps has operated without any ties to the military or intelligence agencies, like the CIA. But, service in the Peace Corps is now an option for military recruits. They can apply to serve the non-active duty part of their military obligation in the Peace Corps, if they get accepted. This wasn’t the original intent of the Peace Corp and some are concerned by the alternative.

Former Peace Corps volunteer Mark Schneider and former Defense Department official Frank Gaffney weigh in with Hardball host Chris Matthews.

CHRIS MATTHEWS, ‘HARDBALL’ HOST: Mark, what is wrong with letting service people, men and women who have signed up for, say, eight years in the Reserves, to spend the last couple years, if they get in, in the Peace Corps?

Peace Corps Online

MARK SCHNEIDER, FORMER PEACE CORPS DIRECTOR: The main problem is that it undermines the independence of the Peace Corps. Ever since the Peace Corps began, not only President Kennedy from the outset, but every secretary of state since and every president since, Republican and Democratic, have issued executive orders and sent cables to the field, saying the Peace Corps shall be independent of day-to-day foreign and security policy. This blurs the line in a way that not only endangers the legacy of the Peace Corps, which has been very successful, but, unfortunately, also, to some degree, endangers volunteers.

You want to keep these institutions separate.

MATTHEWS: You rang a bell there, having been a volunteer back in the ‘60s. How does it endanger volunteers to have some former service people involved?

SCHNEIDER: Unfortunately, right now, there's a sense that there's a growing anti-Americanism in relation to Iraq, other reasons.

If it is known that Peace Corps volunteers, in a sense, are part of the military, in the sense that they're serving out their military obligation, that could in fact endanger volunteers. That's one of the reason why we‘ve always kept it separate and why the secretary of state has issued orders that you should not in fact try and use the Peace Corps for normal foreign policy reasons.

MATTHEWS: Frank Gaffney, you think it is OK to have military people use part of their service, if they get into the Peace Corps, to use it in the Peace Corps?

FRANK GAFFNEY, FOUNDER & PRESIDENT OF CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY: I approach it from a different perspective. And I will put that up front.

We're in a war. The war we're in is going to require us for the foreseeable future to have capable people that are properly trained and properly equipped. Of those three, probably the most important I think is the people. Inducements to service in an all-volunteer force in time of war are going to become increasingly creative.

And this was one that was introduced three years ago, I think, by Senator John McCain and Senator Evan Bayh as a device for trying to make military service more attractive to some people who would like to participate in the Peace Corps.

That is, I think, an important idea and an important initiative.

Peace Corps Online

FRANK GAFFNEY, FOUNDER & PRESIDENT OF CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY: Obviously, in this war, you also want to be able to bring other tools to bear. And those tools can include diplomacy. They can include economic or financial tools. They can include intelligence. The Peace Corps has a role to play in that. It, too, wants the best people it can get. I'm reasonably sure some of those are going to be excellent military veterans. And I hope, and believe, that that can be accomplished without undue cost to either the corps or its personnel.

SCHNEIDER: There is a way to do it, which is to say that the military service is military service. You finish your military service and then you apply like every other American for entering the Peace Corps.

That's the way it should be.

MATTHEWS: Why don‘t you just say to a guy — you want to be induced people to join the military? You don't have to go in for the full eight years. Go in for six. That's an inducement. After you‘ve done your six, join the Peace Corps.

Why do you have to include it as part of the package?

GAFFNEY: I think the idea was to get people to come in for the full stint.

MATTHEWS: Is the Peace Corps having problems recruiting people?

GAFFNEY: I'm talking about the military having problems recruiting people.

MATTHEWS: But why would a person in the military want to be. Wouldn‘t it be better inducement to say, you have only got six years to serve, if you want to do six?

GAFFNEY: Conceivably. I think the way….

MATTHEWS: That's a better deal than you got to do eight and spend two in Africa.

GAFFNEY: The way it's been structured is to give them that as part of an overall package of eight.

MATTHEWS: I want to ask you the question. You're a reasonable person.

If a person is sitting over there in Africa and they're a person who is, say, in Swaziland, where I served back in the ‘60s, and a guy comes up — I‘ll tell you what happened to me.

I was over there and a guy came up. I was kidding around with a friend of mine over there in Swazi. And I said, you know, of course, I'm CIA, laughing. He says, never joke about that. That's not funny. And here's a guy that thought the pope was in London. He didn‘t know much about the Western world. But he knew the CIA was bad.

And isn‘t it the same problem?

SCHNEIDER: It is the same problem.

MATTHEWS: I just know, from personal experience, that if there's any doubt about why you are or who you are —because all you are is some guy from America and that you look different, in many cases. You talk different. And they go, now, who is this guy that's come to teach me, in my case, business? And what is he really up to? Is this a cover? Did he kill anybody in Iraq?

I mean, there's like a case. Do you want guys who have actually been in combat to be in some other country and let them all know you were in combat in Iraq? Do you think that's work?

GAFFNEY: I certainly want to preclude people who are people who are otherwise qualified.

MATTHEWS: I don‘t know.

GAFFNEY: No, you asked me a question. I wouldn't preclude veterans who have served their country in difficult places from serving their country in other ways, if they're qualified.

MATTHEWS: If they‘re out of the military?

GAFFNEY: Well, I think that's a question that ought to be addressed.

MATTHEWS: But you told me before you came on that you can still be called back.

Peace Corps Online

MATTHEWS: So, you‘re over serving in Kenya somewhere. You could be a guy who is working with you over there, a local ministry person from the ministry you‘re working for, knows the whole time you‘re over there that you can get yanked back into the military. So, he always sees you as a...

GAFFNEY: Under very extreme circumstances.

MATTHEWS: But he always sees you as a military type, doesn‘t he?

GAFFNEY: I don't know. The question of whether that is a problem ought to be addressed.

MATTHEWS: Mark, is that a problem?

SCHNEIDER: That‘s a problem.

It is not only a problem for that individual. The problem is for all the other volunteers that are going to be thought of as potentially still in the military who have nothing to do with the military. And what you're doing there is, you‘re endangering the Peace Corps, which is, long term, in the interests of the United States, is providing people around the world with the knowledge about who we are as a people.

It is in a sense doing what you talk about, in terms of fighting the war on terrorism by letting other countries know who we are. You're endangering that for a very few number of people who might...

MATTHEWS: Here's one I would want. If I were a military guy, I would not take this option.

Suppose you‘re over there fighting, risking your life for your country for a couple years in Iraq and you‘re involved in combat. You're really in it. And you‘re killing people. You're being shot at. It is horrible. The word gets out that you're now serving in Timbuktu somewhere all by your lonesome out in the middle of some bush somewhere, with nobody around you, no guns, nothing, no protection.

And they know you're over there. It's not hard for them to figure out where our guys are. Do you think you would like to be stuck out there all by yourself without a gun, stuck in the middle of Africa?

That any time an al Qaida guy wanted to go pick you off, they could do it with impunity? Wouldn‘t that be a problem for you?

GAFFNEY: It might be a problem for me. It might be a problem for everybody else, in which case this is a moot point.


GAFFNEY: But the question is, if it‘s not, if some guys would like to opt for this, they still have to go through all of the rigmarole that gets you into the Peace Corps. But if they want to do that, Chris, it seems to me, they shouldn‘t be denied the opportunity to do it.

MATTHEWS: OK. Let me ask you a question.

GAFFNEY: And your question as to whether or not there ought to be an amendment to the law that gets them out of the military reasonable question to debate.

MATTHEWS: I think it would be great. First of all, I think military guys, with their training, should join the Peace Corps when they‘re done. I think it would be great. That‘s a totally different story.

GAFFNEY: Well, but they got the same problem that you just posed. They could conceivably have the same problem. What I would still ask is, we are going to have to come to grips as a nation with the problem of meeting the needs of the military in a wartime environment.

SCHNEIDER: Sure, but don‘t destroy the Peace Corps to do it.

GAFFNEY: I‘m not suggesting that you do. I'm not sure this would.

But we do need to have that debate, too. And this may not be the fulcrum on which it turns, but I think it is part of the larger debate we have to have.

MATTHEWS: You could promise them they could go to Harvard for the last two years. You can make all kinds of promises.

GAFFNEY: That could be even more dangerous than Tanzania. Who knows?

SCHNEIDER: No, the problem is not only with these individuals. The problem is the rest of the volunteers serving, who are going to be put into this same basket or could be by somebody who wanted in fact to take advantage of the argument that they‘re in the military.

MATTHEWS: Last question. Do you think the existing Peace Corps rules that says you can never have served in an American intelligence agency before serving in the Peace Corps is a good rule?

GAFFNEY: I don‘t know whether it is in fact implemented.


GAFFNEY: I would assume that the same basic principle applies as the one that's just been laid out here.

MATTHEWS: But do you think it is problem? Do you think is OK for intelligence spooks to go work in the Peace Corps?

GAFFNEY: Personally, we need human intelligence everywhere. And I wouldn‘t use anybody's cover inappropriately, but there may be certain cases where it is...

MATTHEWS: If anybody gets idea that Peace Corps guys are CIA, they‘re dead.

SCHNEIDER: Let's be clear that there has been executive orders issued by every president not to have not to use the Peace Corps in any way. And it has not been done.

MATTHEWS: You‘ve never heard, I‘ve never heard of a Peace Corps volunteer ever involved with the CIA.

MATTHEWS: Have you?

GAFFNEY: I‘m not suggesting that they are.

MATTHEWS: Have you ever heard of any connection?

SCHNEIDER: Not that I know of.


GAFFNEY: You asked a hypothetical question.

MATTHEWS: I think we should always be able to answer it negatively.

SCHNEIDER: Exactly. And every president has in fact established a rule that they may not. And it has never been violated.

Watch 'Hardball' each night at 7 p.m. ET on MSNBC.
© 2005 MSNBC Interactive

When this story was posted in August 2005, this was on the front page of PCOL:

Contact PCOLBulletin BoardRegisterSearch PCOLWhat's New?

Peace Corps Online The Independent News Forum serving Returned Peace Corps Volunteers
The Peace Corps Library Date: March 27 2005 No: 536 The Peace Corps Library
Peace Corps Online is proud to announce that the Peace Corps Library is now available online. With over 30,000 index entries in 500 categories, this is the largest collection of Peace Corps related stories in the world. From Acting to Zucchini, you can find hundreds of stories about what RPCVs with your same interests or from your Country of Service are doing today. If you have a web site, support the "Peace Corps Library" and link to it today.

Top Stories and Breaking News PCOL Magazine Peace Corps Library RPCV Directory Sign Up

Military Option sparks concerns Date: August 3 2005 No: 698 Military Option sparks concerns
The U.S. military, struggling to fill its voluntary ranks, is allowing recruits to meet part of their military obligations by serving in the Peace Corps. Read why there is rising opposition to the program among RPCVs. Director Vasquez says the agency has a long history of accepting qualified applicants who are in inactive military status. John Coyne says "Not only no, but hell no!" Latest: RPCV Chris Matthews to discuss the issue on Hardball tonight.

Top Stories: August 1, 2005 Date: July 31 2005 No: 693 Top Stories: August 1, 2005
Paul E. Tsongas Public Service Award unveiled 21 July
Charlie Peters writes book on Wendell Willkie 25 July
Protests against Peace Corps in Bangladesh 30 July
Christopher R. Hill leads talks with North Korea 29 July
Chris Shays blocks senator's plan to reopen bases 29 July
Dr. Joann LaPerla-Morales leads Middlesex College 28 July
Jacob Mundy supports struggle in Western Sahara 28 July
Paul Theroux blames big oil for ‘catastrophe’ in Ecuador 28 July
Bruce Wilkinson has called Africa home for 17 years 25 July
Taylor Hackford producing "E-Ring" for tv 25 July
Robert Haas to retire as head of Levi Strauss 24 July
Brent Lynn turned Janus Overseas Fund around 24 July
James Rupert says Musharraf walks tightrope in Pakistan 23 July
Thomas O. Mann describes Carp Fishing in France 22 July
Rob Quigley receives Maybeck Award in Architecture 22 July
Blackwill says visit by India PM a 'historical breakthrough' 21 July
NPCA studies membership structure 21 July
Mark Lenzi says Poles deserve the West's support 20 July
Mark Gearan weighs in on Bush's Supreme Court pick 20 July
Ofelia Miramontes championed bilingual education 18 July
Hank Stelzer supports school for blind in Lesotho 16 July

Special Events for RPCVs Date: July 31 2005 No: 694 Special Events for RPCVs
RPCV's "Taking the Early Bus" at Cal State until Aug 15
"Artists and Patrons in Traditional African Cultures" in NY thru Sept 30
See RPCV Musical "Doing Good" in CA through Sept
RPCV Film Festival in DC in October

July 17, 2005: This Week's Top Stories Date: July 17 2005 No: 690 July 17, 2005: This Week's Top Stories
C. Payne Lucas writes "Can we win the war on HIV/Aids?" 11 July
Director Vasquez hints at expansion in Bangladesh 17 July
Why didn't I spend my life helping others? 17 July
John Beasley returns to the islands of Micronesia 17 July
Jennifer Field to study glacier melting 17 July
Tucker McCravy works with Serendib in Sri Lanka 17 July
David Vick writes "Waging civilized warfare" 16 July
Tom Petri says Nelson helped to promote civility 16 July
Peace Corps Director Visits Volunteers in Mongolia 15 July
John Bridgeland writes "An example for Boomers" 15 July
Robert Blackwill says India and US have a great future 15 July
Peace Corps debuts new internet recruitment tool 14 July
Eight New Country Directors Appointed 13 July
Shelton Johnson Honored for Buffalo Soldier program 13 July
Bill Lorenz leads trek for Sudanese refugees 12 July
Emilie Pryor says Peace Corps ignores Lariam problems 12 July
DDN is Award Finalist for reporting on PC Safety 11 July
Randy Lewis to hire 200 people with cognitive disabilities 10 July
Maryland needs people like Tom Lewis 10 July
Dan DeWayne puts on music festival 10 July

Friends of the Peace Corps 170,000  strong Date: April 2 2005 No: 543 Friends of the Peace Corps 170,000 strong
170,000 is a very special number for the RPCV community - it's the number of Volunteers who have served in the Peace Corps since 1961. It's also a number that is very special to us because March is the first month since our founding in January, 2001 that our readership has exceeded 170,000. And while we know that not everyone who comes to this site is an RPCV, they are all "Friends of the Peace Corps." Thanks everybody for making PCOL your source of news for the Returned Volunteer community.

Read the stories and leave your comments.

Some postings on Peace Corps Online are provided to the individual members of this group without permission of the copyright owner for the non-profit purposes of criticism, comment, education, scholarship, and research under the "Fair Use" provisions of U.S. Government copyright laws and they may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owner. Peace Corps Online does not vouch for the accuracy of the content of the postings, which is the sole responsibility of the copyright holder.

Story Source: MSNBC Hardball

This story has been posted in the following forums: : Headlines; Figures; COS - Swaziland; Journalism; Television; Military; Safety and Security of Volunteers


Add a Message

This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.