2009.04.24: April 24, 2009: Headlines: Speaking Out: Congress: Huffington Post: Congressman Earl Blumenauer writes: My daughter in the Peace Corps is at greater risk because the degrading and brutal treatment of these prisoners has inflamed the attitudes of people who are inclined not to like us
Peace Corps Online:
Peace Corps News:
Speaking Out:
January 23, 2005: Index: PCOL Exclusive: Speaking Out (1 of 5) :
Speaking Out - New Stories:
2009.04.24: April 24, 2009: Headlines: Speaking Out: Congress: Huffington Post: Congressman Earl Blumenauer writes: My daughter in the Peace Corps is at greater risk because the degrading and brutal treatment of these prisoners has inflamed the attitudes of people who are inclined not to like us
Congressman Earl Blumenauer writes: My daughter in the Peace Corps is at greater risk because the degrading and brutal treatment of these prisoners has inflamed the attitudes of people who are inclined not to like us
It's hard to calculate the damage that has been done by the Bush administration-approved interrogation policy. The ill-advised and immoral practices that have come to light are intolerable. The United States, from before its founding under the leadership of George Washington, enforced a moral imperative against torture. It was not only inhumane but also bad strategy and bad tactics. The proud tradition of, at least officially, being opposed to torture included the United States leadership in international agreements we didn't just sign, but helped to negotiate.
Congressman Earl Blumenauer writes: My daughter in the Peace Corps is at greater risk because the degrading and brutal treatment of these prisoners has inflamed the attitudes of people who are inclined not to like us
There Must Be Consequences
It's hard to calculate the damage that has been done by the Bush administration-approved interrogation policy. The ill-advised and immoral practices that have come to light are intolerable. The United States, from before its founding under the leadership of George Washington, enforced a moral imperative against torture. It was not only inhumane but also bad strategy and bad tactics. The proud tradition of, at least officially, being opposed to torture included the United States leadership in international agreements we didn't just sign, but helped to negotiate.
The torture policy under the Bush administration was counterproductive in the extreme. Waterboarding somebody 183 times and having a doctor monitor the oxygen level in the prisoner's blood so that they bring him right to the point of death but don't actually kill him is barbaric by any standard. These tactics, after all, were what we prosecuted people for war crimes when they were inflicted against our troops in World War II. These torture techniques were developed by mimicking what our enemies did to our soldiers in prior conflicts. They aren't just counterproductive in terms of a vague image of the United States, they're actually dangerous. My daughter in the Peace Corps is at greater risk because the degrading and brutal treatment of these prisoners has inflamed the attitudes of people who are inclined not to like us. It undercuts any moral authority we have to condemn, much less prevent, brutal treatment of the United States civilians or soldiers.
As the stories come out of the mistreatment -- not just torture, but death of people in American custody -- we should be systematic, thoughtful, and dispassionate about a full accounting. While I'm open to the president's idea of a commission, I think Congress should be involved with investigations by the appropriate committees. There is behavior that was quite possibly illegal. It was possibly against the law. I think it was unethical for the legal personnel and they violated their professional oaths of responsibility. If so, then they should be disbarred or, in the case of those on the bench, impeached. There were clearly illegal activities not operating under clear guidance. Criminal prosecution would be in order through our legal system.
Not everyone involved is guilty of these intolerable practices. One of the most important mechanisms of a commission or legislative activity would be to spotlight men and women of principle and integrity who refused to go along. It is important to acknowledge people who did their duty, because we're coming to find out that many people stepped up and did the right thing.
Some argue that in this already hopelessly partisan and bitterly divided Congress, in a 24-hour news cycle, and a desperate search by the extreme right wing to rediscover some sort national cause, that this would be divisive. I think ignoring it is worse than divisive in terms of consequences. Divisiveness didn't stop the other side as they formulated and followed disastrous torture policies that have already divided us in our country, divided dedicated professional public- servants, and divided us from our friends and allies around the world.
At minimum, I hope we can accelerate the current process of exposing the cleansing light of truth. This will provide the public with more information to help form a judgment and perhaps, consensus, that once and for all the United States shall torture no more.
Links to Related Topics (Tags):
Headlines: April, 2009; Speaking Out; Congress
When this story was posted in May 2009, this was on the front page of PCOL:
Peace Corps Online The Independent News Forum serving Returned Peace Corps Volunteers
| Director Ron Tschetter: The PCOL Interview Peace Corps Director Ron Tschetter sat down for an in-depth interview to discuss the evacuation from Bolivia, political appointees at Peace Corps headquarters, the five year rule, the Peace Corps Foundation, the internet and the Peace Corps, how the transition is going, and what the prospects are for doubling the size of the Peace Corps by 2011. Read the interview and you are sure to learn something new about the Peace Corps. PCOL previously did an interview with Director Gaddi Vasquez. |
Read the stories and leave your comments.
Some postings on Peace Corps Online are provided to the individual members of this group without permission of the copyright owner for the non-profit purposes of criticism, comment, education, scholarship, and research under the "Fair Use" provisions of U.S. Government copyright laws and they may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owner. Peace Corps Online does not vouch for the accuracy of the content of the postings, which is the sole responsibility of the copyright holder.
Story Source: Huffington Post
This story has been posted in the following forums: : Headlines; Speaking Out; Congress
PCOL43718
99