February 8, 2002 - MSNBC: George and Jack

Peace Corps Online: Peace Corps News: Speaking Out: January 23, 2005: Index: PCOL Exclusive: Speaking Out (1 of 5) : Peace Corps: Speaking Out: February 8, 2002 - MSNBC: George and Jack

By Admin1 (admin) on Monday, February 11, 2002 - 8:19 am: Edit Post

George and Jack

Read and comment on this opinion piece by Swaziland RPCV Chris Matthews on the parallels between JFK and President George W. Bush including the strong support of both Presidents of the Peace Corps at:

George and Jack *

* This link was active on the date it was posted. PCOL is not responsible for broken links which may have changed.

George and Jack

Presidential flashback: In policy and words, Bush is sounding a lot like JFK By Chris Matthews MSNBC

WASHINGTON, Feb. 8 — This week, I finally figured out who George W. Bush is. He is a classic New Frontiersman. If you doubt me, just run through the guy’s policy blueprint — higher defense spending, tax cuts, a call to national service. Add to that his commitment to free trade and his push for prescription drugs for seniors and you see the outlines of the John F. Kennedy agenda.

LET’S FACE IT. This first Republican president of the 21st century champions the same signature policies that Democrat John F. Kennedy did in the early 1960s. Here’s Bush in his State of the Union: “History has called America and our allies to action, and it is both our responsibility and our privilege to fight freedom’s fight.” Here is JFK in his Inaugural: “Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure the survival and the success of liberty.”

SIMILARITIES ABOUND Both young presidents backed up their martial call to duty with a military budget hike. Kennedy’s rationale was the “missile gap” between the United States and the U.S.S.R. “We have not maintained our position and our prestige,” he argued in his 1960 debate with Republican Vice President Richard Nixon. Bush’s rationale is the dangers implicit in the doctrine of mutually assured destruction. Where Jack wanted more missiles, George wants a strategic defense system to neutralize enemy missiles. To get it, he wants the largest defense boost in 20 years. Both presidents are foreign-policy activists, uncomfortable in a defensive posture. Just as JFK wanted to help countries defend themselves against the Soviets and the Chinese, Bush wants to destroy the capability of countries such as Iraq, Iran and North Korea to attack their neighbors. “We cannot merely state our opposition to totalitarian advance without paying the price for helping those now under the greatest pressure.”


Another glaring similarity: Both leaders advocate the role of young volunteers in selling the American way overseas. Kennedy created the Peace Corps to show how a “free society” can compete for the hearts and minds of those in the Third World. “Every young American who participates in the Peace Corps — who works in a foreign land — will know that he or she is sharing in the great common task of bringing to men that decent way of life which is the foundation of freedom and a condition of peace.” Bush has created a Freedom Corps at home, and wants to expand the Peace Corps overseas. “I believe that one thing we must do,” he told a North Carolina audience the day after his State of the Union, “is to expand the Peace Corps, revitalize the mission, encourage the Peace Corps to go into the Islamic world to spread the message of economic development and really share the compassion of a great nation, and that is America.”

TAX CUTS, HEALTH CARE A third area of common purpose is cutting federal taxes. Kennedy pushed a tax cut as a way to lift America out of recession and slow growth rates. Like today’s supply-siders, he told us that cutting taxes was a more powerful way to achieve that goal than increasing government spending. “To increase demand and lift the economy, the federal government’s most usual role is not to rush into a program of excessive increases in public expenditures, but to expand the incentives and opportunities for private expenditures.”

Another example is the focus on health care for seniors. Kennedy pushed the legislation that would become Medicare, while Bush campaigned with the desire “to give seniors a sound and modern Medicare system that includes coverage for prescription drugs.” Ultimately, both men believe in free trade. Kennedy went to battle with the unions over it in the 1960s, while today, Bush is doing the same. “Good jobs,” Bush said last Tuesday night, “depend on expanded trade.”


It’s currently an open question whether Bush will match Kennedy’s restraint in foreign policy, or his conviction on the domestic front. Without a doubt, JFK’s greatest achievement was his handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis, when he successfully stood up to both the Soviets to his left and the U.S. military to his right. George W. Bush has a chance to replicate that feat with Iraq. To do so, he must contain not just Saddam Hussein, but also the rightists within his own administration who are pushing for an all-out U.S. attack on that Arab country. If Bush does that, he may well claim a role in history as powerful and heroic as the unforgettable John F. Kennedy.

Some postings on Peace Corps Online are provided to the individual members of this group without permission of the copyright owner for the non-profit purposes of criticism, comment, education, scholarship, and research under the "Fair Use" provisions of U.S. Government copyright laws and they may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owner. Peace Corps Online does not vouch for the accuracy of the content of the postings, which is the sole responsibility of the copyright holder.


By Terry Adcock on Friday, February 15, 2002 - 6:48 am: Edit Post

What happened to all of the comments that were posted here previously?

Those posts successfully refuted every point in Chris Matthews' article above. They need to be posted here.

By Admin1 (admin) on Friday, February 15, 2002 - 7:26 am: Edit Post

This article was posted in two places on the web site - under "Headlines" and also here under "Speaking Out".

Most of the comments were posted in the other location at:


PCOL does not delete or censor posts. Read our policy here in the FAQ.


By Terry Adcock on Saturday, February 16, 2002 - 6:23 am: Edit Post

Sorry. I didn't mean to imply that you were censoring posts. I thought it was a computer glitch. My mistake. Thanks!

So, folks, if you want to see Chris Mattehews soundly refuted (and who doesn't?), check out:

By Admin1 (admin) on Saturday, February 16, 2002 - 7:37 pm: Edit Post

Sorry for the confusion.

Generally we post each story in three separate places on this web site. Stories always go in the "Archives of Recent Headlines" which is a chronological archive of all stories published about the Peace Corps. Next the story goes into it's "special" category - editorial, education, service, third goal, or whatever. Finally if the story mentions a COS, it also goes into the Forum for that COS.

Thanks for pointing out that this system can be confusing. From now on when we post a story we will put a message at the end of the story that shows what other forums the story has been posted to.

Best Regards,


Add a Message

This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.