February 16, 2002 - Orange County Register: Vasquez gets his orders
Peace Corps Online:
Peace Corps News:
Peace Corps Headlines - 2002:
02 February 2002 Peace Corps Headlines:
February 16, 2002 - Orange County Register: Vasquez gets his orders
Vasquez gets his orders
Read and comment on this story from the Orange County Register, his hometown newspaper, on Gaddi Vasquez's swearing in as Peace Corps Director and the challenges that he will face at:
Vasquez gets his orders *
* This link was active on the date it was posted. PCOL is not responsible for broken links which may have changed.
Vasquez gets his orders
Bush tells O.C. appointee to return the Peace Corps to Afghanistan.
February 16, 2002
By DENA BUNIS The Orange County Register
WASHINGTON -- Gaddi Vasquez had only been Peace Corps chief for minutes Friday when President George W. Bush substantially expanded his job, directing him to bring volunteers back into Afghanistan and double the agency's presence worldwide.
The former Orange County supervisor was sworn in at a private Oval Office ceremony, becoming the highest-profile administration official from Orange County.
"A spirit of sacrifice and service gave birth to the Peace Corps more than 40 years ago," Bush said after Vasquez's swearing in. "We needed the Peace Corps then, and we need the Peace Corps today."
Bush's Peace Corps expansion plan includes doubling to 15,000 the number of volunteers, making it the largest Peace Corps since 1966.
And for the first time since 1979, the Peace Corps will have a mission in Afghanistan. A team to scope out the needs, safety and extent of such a mission will head to Afghanistan within the next three weeks.
For the first time, Bush wants to send volunteers to Azerbaijan, East Timor and Bosnia-Herzegovina as well as return volunteers to Peru, Swaziland, Chad and Botswana. Volunteers left those countries for a variety of reasons, including a rebel uprising in Chad in 1989 and accusations in 1977 that volunteers in Peru were actually spies.
Bush, who will visit Asia next week, said he plans to push Chinese officials to allow an expansion of the Peace Corps there.
In each of these countries, Vasquez said, a thorough assessment will be done before sending in volunteers.
"The assessment will make sure the programs we implement are first of value to the volunteers so that it is a rewarding experience and of value and benefit to the host country," Vasquez said in an interview after his White House swearing-in. Vasquez was sworn in by White House Counsel Al Gonzalez while Bush and Vasquez's wife and son looked on.
"The Peace Corps volunteers carry the American idea with them," Bush said. "If we were not to allow the Peace Corps to expand, we would be doing exactly what the terrorists want us to do, and we're not going to let them cause us to abandon what we hold dear."
At Vasquez's confirmation hearing, former volunteers tried to block his nomination, saying he had no Peace Corps experience. They also raised his handling of the Orange County bankruptcy as a reason he should not be confirmed. Their arguments failed, and Vasquez was easily approved.
Before being named to the Peace Corps, Vasquez was head of public affairs at Southern California Edison Co. He was a California adviser to Bush's presidential campaign and transferred $100,000 from his dormant campaign treasury to the Bush effort. His salary will be $133,700 a year.
Bush's expansion announcement Friday, Vasquez said, will give the program the kind of boost it needs. But that's just a start.
"We need to engage in a good outreach effort," Vasquez said. "We need a strong growth strategy that is inclusive. We could do better in terms of the minorities that are participating in the Peace Corps."
Vasquez said he hopes his bilingual ability will help him court the Latino community, which does not have a history of widespread Peace Corps participation.
"I hope I can inspire them to take a look at the Peace Corps," he said.
Vasquez said he doesn't know if he will be part of the Afghanistan assessment team. The group is expected to include former Peace Corps volunteers, current staff members and security experts who will study construction, education, water and other potential projects.
The corps left Afghanistan 23 years ago during the Soviet occupation of the country.
Former Peace Corps volunteer Pauline Buzan, 81, of Laguna Hills said the Afghan people would benefit from the Peace Corps' presence.
"People will go there and do good, just like we do in every country," said Buzan, who returned last year from working in Jamaica.
But Lorena Alvarez, 33, of Anaheim thinks officials should wait a few years before sending volunteers into the war-torn country.
"There is a need there, but there is no guaranteed political stability," said Alvarez, a former Peace Corps volunteer in South Africa. "Personally, I wouldn't feel safe there now."
Rep. Christopher Cox, R-Newport Beach, attended the event after Vasquez's swearing in.
Cox said despite Vasquez being a novice to the agency, he believes his people skills and ability to judge talent will serve him well.
"Director Vasquez is taking over at a moment when President Bush has written the Peace Corps directly into the country's worldwide mission to spread freedom and fight terrorism," Cox said.
Bush wants to increase the Peace Corps budget by 15 percent in each of the next five years -- an added $200 million. Staff writer Rachanee Srisavasdi contributed to this report.
Some postings on Peace Corps Online are provided to the individual members of this group without permission of the copyright owner for the non-profit purposes of criticism, comment, education, scholarship, and research under the "Fair Use" provisions of U.S. Government copyright laws and they may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owner. Peace Corps Online does not vouch for the accuracy of the content of the postings, which is the sole responsibility of the copyright holder.
This story has been posted in the following forums: Headlines; Special Reports; US Peace Corps - PC/Washington; Afghanistan
This is so totally wrong I have nothing to say. I wonder what Vasquez's reaction will be when PCVs start returning in body bags.
kyrgyz rep, '96-'98
I think sending volunteers to Afghanistan prematurely is a good example of politics driving out good sense. Can former volunteers to that country effectively advise current staff as to when it might be a good idea? I don't know the country, but I wonder what kind of infrastructure can be set up there to support volunteers out in the countryside. I think the Peace Corps must proceed cautiously. Alan Boyd, Ethiopia 64-66
It is entirely too premature to think of sending Peace Corps Volunteers back into Afghanistan. The idea is sound but the timing is bad. How can we defend the idea with U.S. troops still in country, fighting and dying! Lets wait till the country is more secure and U.S. troops are gone. Once you have a U.N. Peace-Keeping force in country it would make more sense, even though it still would be a risky venture.
Lets hear from former Afghan PCV's?
Ed Willett, President
Friends of India
I am the mother of a RPCV and I would not want my daughter to be going to Afghanistan now.It still is not safe and there certainly is no hurry in putting these young kids in harm's way. Please wait till the war is over and we are certain there are no Taliban running around on the lose. Safety comes first with these young inexperience kids. Please give this your upmost consideration..Thank you, Ann Hannibal
As the recently returned Team Leader of the USAID Disaster Assistance Response Team ("DART") for Afghanistan, while I can understand and support the desire of the Administration to show utmost support for the rebuilding of Afghanistan, it is far too premature to begin sending PCVs to that still very dangerous land. Even if something of that nature were to move forward quickly, I am certain these Volunteers would be very much restricted to Kabul and perhaps one or two other "major" urban areas (e.g., Herat), but nothing like a wide spread PCV program in Afghanistan will be possible for a long time to come.
While it is certainly a good idea to "keep the door open" and let the interim Afghan government know that the US is interested in re-establishing the Peace Corps in Afghanistan, everything I've heard about current conditions there would suggest that we move with caution.Clearly the situation must be considerably more stable before new volunteers (or even former Afghan PCV's)are sent there. I was among the last PCV's in Kabul and when we were asked to leave, the situation was deteriorating, but far more stable than it is now.
Caryn Giles Lawson
RPCV, Kabul 1977-79
By BEHO on Tuesday, April 02, 2002 - 8:13 pm: Edit Post|
AFGANISTAN NEEDS US AND WE SHOULD NOT THINK TOO LONG TO HELP THAT COUNTRY.
This is great PR for politics and potentially deadly news for PCV.
Afganistan is no were near the level of stability that PCV can work in. PCV are not soliders, just ordinary citizens with a big heart. Not trained for such hostile enviornment. We would be inviting kidnappings, and exposing PCV to accidental deaths with all the land mines still undetected.
I doubt if any of our leaders children would be allowed to volunteer for such a hazardous mission.
PCV's have a right to know that their host country is reasonably safe to work and live in.
Can anyone come to this conclusion about Afganistan at this time. It's time for a reality check at PCV headquarters. Don't put politics above the safety of PCV's. As a former volunteer in Columbia, SA. Four years of service. It would brake my heart to read headlines of kidnapping, and deaths of PCV's in Afganistan. Knowing that the country is unstable and we sent in volunteers to the slaughter.