2006.03.02: March 2, 2006: Headlines: Figures: COS - Thailand: Diplomacy: Hunger: Mother Jones: Tony Hall talks about his fight against a much-neglected issue: world hunger

Peace Corps Online: Directory: Thailand: Special Report: RPCV Tony Hall: Tony Hall: Newest Stories: 2006.03.02: March 2, 2006: Headlines: Figures: COS - Thailand: Diplomacy: Hunger: Mother Jones: Tony Hall talks about his fight against a much-neglected issue: world hunger

By Admin1 (admin) (pool-151-196-186-164.balt.east.verizon.net - on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 - 5:47 am: Edit Post

Tony Hall talks about his fight against a much-neglected issue: world hunger

Tony Hall talks about his fight against a much-neglected issue: world hunger

A Democratic congressional representative from Ohio for 24 years, Tony Hall continues to believe he has the power to change the world. That change might come, as Mother Teresa once reminded him, "just a drop at a time," but Hall is willing to be patient, with a deeply-rooted devotion grounded in both liberal ideals and his strong Christian faith. Hall now works as a UN Ambassador for Food and Agriculture in Rome, where he attempts to bridge religious and partisan divides in order to make progress on world hunger.

Tony Hall talks about his fight against a much-neglected issue: world hunger

Changing the Face of Hunger

Interview: A former Congressman talks about his fight against a much-neglected issue: world hunger.

Tony Hall
By Juliana Bunim

March 2, 2006

It's hard to get a concrete image of global poverty, to put faces on, for instance, the 852 million people around the world who suffer from hunger. Even for seasoned politicians like Tony Hall, the devastation never seems real until it's seen firsthand. Hall's book, Changing the Face of Hunger, describes his humanitarian efforts in Ethiopia, where he saw world hunger up close, and his attempts to bring the problem to the attention of those in Washington, advocating for those who have no voice in global politics.

A Democratic congressional representative from Ohio for 24 years, Tony Hall continues to believe he has the power to change the world. That change might come, as Mother Teresa once reminded him, "just a drop at a time," but Hall is willing to be patient, with a deeply-rooted devotion grounded in both liberal ideals and his strong Christian faith. Hall now works as a UN Ambassador for Food and Agriculture in Rome, where he attempts to bridge religious and partisan divides in order to make progress on world hunger.

Hall recently talked with Mother Jones about his fight against world hunger, the ongoing conflict in Darfur, and how it was possible to be both a devout Christian and a Democrat.

Mother Jones: In 1993, you fasted for twenty-two days in order to call attention to hunger issues. Can you explain why you decided to do this?

Tony Hall: The 22-day fast started when I was the Chairman of the Select Committee on Hunger. During that time Congress was running high budget deficits, and both parties felt they needed to start living within their means. That was smart and wise, but it meant that they had to cut several select committees, including mine. But I thought, "This is the smallest committee in the Congress, the most bipartisan, and the New York Times called us 'the conscience of the Congress.' Why would you start with us when we do good?" Regardless, they decided to cut the committee, and told the public the money would go back to them. But that never happened and the people never got their money back. Not to mention, the committee's budget wasn't very big, something around $287,000.

So I felt that Congress really had a lack of concern about what I thought were important issues. We were covering domestic and international hunger. It was the only committee of its kind in the country that was focusing on issues and passing legislation. I didn't quite know what to do. I was so mad, so frustrated, I felt like quitting Congress right then and there. I thought, how can I bring attention to this issue, but at the same time make a difference?

My wife came up with the idea of doing a fast. She mentioned Isaiah 58, especially the second part of it, which focuses on what a fast should be about. I checked it out with a few friends and asked what they thought. They felt it was a good idea. I didn't feel comfortable with it when I started because I felt that I wasn't a very flashy kind of Congressman. I was stepping out of my comfort zone. But I went ahead and announced the fast. I was going to fast and not eat any food for twenty-two days.

MJ: Other than drawing the attention of Congress, what did the fast mean for you?

TH: Any fast should be about an issue that is important to you, but it shouldn't be about you. For Isaiah, the fast had to be one of faith and unto God first. I started my fast thinking this was the end of my career. I thought nobody will ever understand this. I felt my constituents would think, "This guy has lost it." So I went home, ready to face the music, and they practically had a parade for me. One of the Catholic high schools had a three day fast in solidarity, including the parents. One thing led to another and the press began to write about it in a very good way. Both on the left and the right. It was picked up and several thousands high school and universities became part of the fast. A couple movie stars picked it up. It began to gather momentum.

MJ: What was the reaction from other members of Congress? They must have thought you were crazy not to eat for 22 days.

TH: At first they didn't understand it because no one had ever fasted in Congress. And many people thought, "Why would somebody fast for hunger?" What can you possibly prove by doing something like that? It wasn't understood right away. But when I started to fast, it was right before Easter and we went on recess for about two weeks. During the time that we were out of session was when all the publicity started to hit. So when I came back to resume, I had been fasting at that time for about 15-17 days. By that time they were beginning to understand it and were interested.

MJ: After Congress was back in session, you continued to fast. Did you attend committee meetings having had nothing to eat for more than two weeks?

TH: I did. If you get over the initial seven days without food, and drink a lot of water, you get over the hunger. I just drank water, no supplements. I lost 22 lbs in 22 days. Once I got through the first week it was much easier. Then I began to understand what it really means to go hungry. Why, for instance, when people are really hungry in Africa and in the different famines I've seen, why don't they rush to food right away when it becomes available? Well, you lose a lot of your hunger and lose the ability to eat. That's why sometimes it's necessary to force feed people because the body begins to turn against itself.

MJ: Did you experience any symptoms of malnutrition?

TH: No, I lost weight. I didn't experience malnutrition. You need to go longer than I did to feel severe symptoms. I knew I would be able to eat again. But many people don't. Actually, I was healthier after three weeks of fasting than I was before I started. Doctors couldn't figure it out. My blood and everything was perfect.

MJ: You had a lot of international experience before becoming a UN Ambassador, but in your book you cite a trip to Ethiopia as a turning point. Why did that trip influence you so profoundly?

TH: Well, I had never in all my trips seen so many people die. I was taken aback. The reason I went over there was because I was constantly hearing that 7,000 people were dying per day. I said, "How can that be?" I needed to try to understand what that actually meant, what was going on, and why. I went over there and had never in my life seen people die like that. I never got over it. It stuck with me. Returning on the plane, I realized that this is something that I can do and make a difference on. We do a lot of things in Congress that don't amount to much, and this can actually mean something.

MJ: Speaking to what the U.S. is doing now to fight poverty in Africa, are we taking an effective stance and will it make a long term difference?

TH: Actually, this administration oversees -- and I know this surprises most people -- more aid than any previous administrations. They've doubled aid to Africa and tripled support to fight HIV/AIDS since the Clinton administration. They've really done more. And a lot of people don't know that.

I was just in Kenya the other day because they're having a drought. I was in Nairobi at a major slum and they said if it wasn't for AIDS/HIV drugs from the United States, things would be significantly worse. We're doing more than we've ever done. And we've doubled development assistance. Undoubtedly, we're saving a lot of lives. Can we do more? Yes, we can. And the world can absolutely do more. The world produces enough food right now to feed everybody, if only we had the correct infrastructure to deliver it. But corruption, civil war, terrible leaders, lack of political will and lack of spiritual will, they all stand as impediments. If just the faith-based people took it on, all the different faiths, they'd probably cut hunger in half in a year.

MJ: Is the African Union capable of doing peacekeeping on their own in Darfur?

TH: No, they're not doing enough. They're just getting started in Darfur and they don't know quite what to do. The potential for them in the future is very important because Africans need to learn how to handle their own problems, especially in places like Darfur. Their leaders need to be more responsible to their people and leaders in surrounding countries need to play a role as well. But we need to be more aggressive in telling them that they're starving their people, that their civil war is irresponsible.

MJ: When you're speaking about Darfur, for example, the government corruption is very apparent. What type of intervention is necessary there?

TJ: Darfur is a tough one. It's not just the leadership of the Khartoum government, it's also the tribal leadership, it's tribe against tribe, it's pastoralist against farmers, it's blacks against Arabs, it's corruption, it's people who want to stay in power, it's a little bit of everything. It's Christian versus Arabs, and the north versus the south. And you know what? There is blood on all sides there. I think what they did in bringing [former] Senator Danforth in there was a very good step and we need to go more in that direction. Intervention is needed by people who have a reputation of being able to handle difficult situations.

MJ: Is UN involvement absolutely necessary in Sudan?

TJ: Yes. The African Union is not ready for this. You get mixed reports depending on where you are though. If you're down in Africa, you'll hear a different story than you might here in the West. Something needs to be done for Sudan and they're not doing it.

The number one issue is the complete lack of security among the 2 million people in the refugee camps in Darfur. Those people don't feel comfortable to go home. That's why we need to feed them. They can't go home, they can't plant, they can't harvest, and they can't take care of their animals. Once they feel that things are secure they can return home. They don't want to be refugees, living transitorily in camps. Those camps are terrible. And the violence is penetrating the camps because they are not protected. Women cannot go out at night to gather firewood or they'll get raped. All men that try to escape are murdered. Something needs to be done.

It is going to take attention from the top leaders of the world. President Bush, Tony Blair, they have to put their heads together and use the leadership in the Middle East to their advantage. You've got people like King Abdullah of Jordan and some of the more responsive leaders who could potentially go in there, take a stand and make a difference. It is going to take top leadership and responsibility.

MJ: Because poverty transcends partisan lines, do you employ certain tactics to navigate between the two political parties?

TH: I don't have an answer for the world, but I do know things that work. And I know in my own life I've seen people from different political persuasions that do get together. And I think that the key is to find common ground and build relationships across political lines, tribal lines, economic lines, and that takes a while. One of the best ways for that to happen is for people of faith to come together and put aside issues for awhile. I've seen it happen. Some of my best friends in Congress are Republicans. And this only happened because we didn't talk about issues until we already formed a friendship. If we did it the other way around, we'd be split, they'd go one way, and I'd go the other.

MJ: Why do you think people of faith are so often equated with conservative values?

TH I don't know. I think people are going to be surprised when they get to heaven how many Democrats are up there. A lot of Democrats hold their faith inwardly because if they speak about it publicly they feel inhibited, they don't want to wear their faith on their lapel, and they don't want to be a hypocrite. So they don't talk about it. And then they're branded as being anti-God. I can't tell you how many times people have said to me, "How can you be a Christian and be a Democrat?" If I've heard that once, I've heard it a hundred times.

MJ: Well, how can you be a Christian and a Democrat?

TH:You know, when Jesus came into Jerusalem, he didn't come in on an elephant. He came in on a donkey.

MJ: What about the fact that so many conservatives cite the Bible in defense of their stances on political issues, like abortion and gay marriage?

TH: Those are important issues, but there are other ones as well. Like the poor, like the environment. Like security. Like getting people to work. These are all important issues. And we can't just dwell on one or two issues. I think God cares about a lot of things.

MJ: What happens when your faith and political beliefs clash?

TH: It happens. And when it comes to principles you have to go with your principles. You must vote and speak your principles. But a lot of times these issues are gray. They have these voting records that sometimes conservatives publish, where if you don't vote eight out of ten times for these so-called Christian bills you can't be considered a Christian. Well, according to them I'm borderline. I'm not even fifty percent. But I've tried to figure out what God says about corporation franchise taxes and I can't find it. It's not covered!

I think one of the geniuses of the Constitution is the separation between church and state. It is very important to separate the two. Not to say you can't bring your faith in to the workplace, that's very important, but the last thing you want to do is push your faith down somebody's throat. That turns people off. Not only that, it hurts the cause of God when you do that. People have to be very careful how they use their faith and their religion.

MJ: Do you think President Bush is guided too much by his faith?

TH: As far as the president is concerned, I've never seen him do anything that would drive it down people's throats. That's not to say I haven't seen other politicians do it, and they've done it in a way that's ugly and odious and hurts the cause of God.

MJ: You weren't always a religious person. How did you come to realize the importance of faith?

TH: I came to my faith later in life. I wasn't raised religiously at all. But when I became a Congressman, I felt there had to be more to life than the way it was going. There had to be more than just success and ambition, two things we greatly prioritize in America. Even being a Congressman, I needed something else. I began to look around, doing research, talking to people, attending different churches, studying a lot. I went on a search. And I found it. When I saw some people who took time to explain to me their walk in God, and I saw the sincerity of what they were talking about, I didn't doubt it for a minute. And so I looked at it, thought about it and realized it was what I wanted and it was for me.

I wanted to leave people, after reading the book, with the idea that there is hope. That they can do the thing that's in front of them and make a difference. Even Mother Teresa, the greatest saint of the last century, said what she's doing is a drop in the ocean. But if she didn't do it there would be one less drop.

Juliana Bunim is an editorial intern at Mother Jones.

When this story was posted in March 2006, this was on the front page of PCOL:

Contact PCOLBulletin BoardRegisterSearch PCOLWhat's New?

Peace Corps Online The Independent News Forum serving Returned Peace Corps Volunteers
History of the Peace Corps Date: March 18 2006 No: 834 History of the Peace Corps
PCOL is proud to announce that Phase One of the "History of the Peace Corps" is now available online. This installment includes over 5,000 pages of primary source documents from the archives of the Peace Corps including every issue of "Peace Corps News," "Peace Corps Times," "Peace Corps Volunteer," "Action Update," and every annual report of the Peace Corps to Congress since 1961. "Ask Not" is an ongoing project. Read how you can help.

The Peace Corps Library Date: February 24 2006 No: 798 The Peace Corps Library
The Peace Corps Library is now available online with over 40,000 index entries in 500 categories. Looking for a Returned Volunteer? Check our RPCV Directory. New: Sign up to receive PCOL Magazine, our free Monthly Magazine by email. Like to keep up with Peace Corps news as it happens? Sign up to recieve a daily summary of Peace Corps stories from around the world.

Top Stories and Breaking News PCOL Magazine Peace Corps Library RPCV Directory Sign Up

Peace Corps suspends program in Bangladesh Date: March 16 2006 No: 827 Peace Corps suspends program in Bangladesh
Peace Corps Director Gaddi H. Vasquez announced the suspension of the Peace Corps program in Bangladesh on March 15. The safety and security of volunteers is the number one priority of the Peace Corps. Therefore, all Peace Corps volunteers serving in Bangladesh have safely left the country. More than 280 Peace Corps volunteers have served in Bangladesh since the program opened in November 1998. Latest: What other newspapers say.

Invitee re-assigned after inflammatory remarks Date: March 16 2006 No: 825 Invitee re-assigned after inflammatory remarks
The Peace Corps has pulled the invitation to Derek Volkart to join the Morocco Training Program and offered him a position in the Pacific instead after officials read an article in which he stated that his decision to join the Peace Corps was in "response to our current fascist government." RPCV Lew Nash says that "If Derek Volkart spoke his mind as freely in Morocco about the Moroccan monarchy it could cause major problems for himself and other Peace Corps volunteers." Latest: The Ashland Daily Tidings has issued a request for all Peace Corps communications on the case.

Re-envision Peace Corps Date: March 16 2006 No: 823 Re-envision Peace Corps
Nicholas J. Slabbert says in his article in the Harvard International Review that an imaginatively reinvented Peace Corps could powerfully promote US interests in a period when perceptions of American motives are increasingly relevant to global realignment. His study envisions a new role for the Peace Corps in five linked areas: (1) reinventing America's international profile via a new use of soft power; (2) moving from a war-defined, non-technological, reactive theory of peace to a theory of peace as a normal, proactive component of technologically advanced democracy; (3) reappraising Peace Corps as a national strategic asset whose value remains largely untapped; (4) Peace Corps as a model for the technological reinvention of government agencies for the 21st century; (5) redefining civil society as information technology society. Read the article and leave your comments.

March 1, 1961: Keeping Kennedy's Promise Date: February 27 2006 No: 800 March 1, 1961: Keeping Kennedy's Promise
On March 1, 1961, President John F. Kennedy issues Executive Order #10924, establishing the Peace Corps as a new agency: "Life in the Peace Corps will not be easy. There will be no salary and allowances will be at a level sufficient only to maintain health and meet basic needs. Men and women will be expected to work and live alongside the nationals of the country in which they are stationed--doing the same work, eating the same food, talking the same language. But if the life will not be easy, it will be rich and satisfying. For every young American who participates in the Peace Corps--who works in a foreign land--will know that he or she is sharing in the great common task of bringing to man that decent way of life which is the foundation of freedom and a condition of peace. "

Top Stories: February 2, 2006 Date: February 4 2006 No: 783 Top Stories: February 2, 2006
Al Kamen writes: Rice to redeploy diplomats 20 Jan
Peace Corps mourns the Loss of Volunteer Tessa Horan 1 Feb
RPCV pursues dreams in America's Heartland 1 Feb
Sargent Shriver documentary to be shown in LA 30 Jan
W. Frank Fountain is new board chairman of Africare 27 Jan
Abbey Brown writes about acid attacks in Bangladesh 26 Jan
Christopher Hill Sees Ray of Hope in N.Korea Standoff 26 Jan
Jeffrey Smit writes on one man diplomatic outposts 25 Jan
Joe Blatchford's ACCION and microfinance 24 Jan
James Rupert writes: A calculated risk in Pakistan 23 Jan
Sam Farr rips conservative immigration bill 21 Jan
Americans campaign for PC to return to Sierra Leone 20 Jan
Kinky Friedman supports Gay Marriage 20 Jan
Margaret Krome writes on Women leaders 18 Jan
James Walsh leads bipartisan US delegation to Ireland 17 Jan
Mark Schneider writes on Elections and Beyond in Haiti 16 Jan
Robert Blackwill on a "serious setback" in US-India relations 13 Jan
Kevin Quigley writes on PC and U.S. Image Abroad 13 Jan
Emily Metzloff rides bicycle 3,100 miles from Honduras 9 Jan
Charles Brennick starts operation InterConnection 9 Jan
Lee Fisher tells story of Pablo Morillo 7 Jan
Nancy Wallace writes: Was PC a CIA front after all? 4 Jan

Paid Vacations in the Third World? Date: February 20 2006 No: 787 Paid Vacations in the Third World?
Retired diplomat Peter Rice has written a letter to the Wall Street Journal stating that Peace Corps "is really just a U.S. government program for paid vacations in the Third World." Director Vasquez has responded that "the small stipend volunteers receive during their two years of service is more than returned in the understanding fostered in communities throughout the world and here at home." What do RPCVs think?

RPCV admits to abuse while in Peace Corps Date: February 3 2006 No: 780 RPCV admits to abuse while in Peace Corps
Timothy Ronald Obert has pleaded guilty to sexually abusing a minor in Costa Rica while serving there as a Peace Corps volunteer. "The Peace Corps has a zero tolerance policy for misconduct that violates the law or standards of conduct established by the Peace Corps," said Peace Corps Director Gaddi H. Vasquez. Could inadequate screening have been partly to blame? Mr. Obert's resume, which he had submitted to the Peace Corps in support of his application to become a Peace Corps Volunteer, showed that he had repeatedly sought and obtained positions working with underprivileged children. Read what RPCVs have to say about this case.

Military Option sparks concerns Date: January 3 2006 No: 773 Military Option sparks concerns
The U.S. military, struggling to fill its voluntary ranks, is allowing recruits to meet part of their reserve military obligations after active duty by serving in the Peace Corps. Read why there is opposition to the program among RPCVs. Director Vasquez says the agency has a long history of accepting qualified applicants who are in inactive military status. John Coyne says "Not only no, but hell no!" and RPCV Chris Matthews leads the debate on "Hardball." Avi Spiegel says Peace Corps is not the place for soldiers while Coleman McCarthy says to Welcome Soldiers to the Peace Corps. Read our poll results. Latest: Congress passed a bill on December 22 including language to remove Peace Corps from the National Call to Service (NCS) military recruitment program

Why blurring the lines puts PCVs in danger Date: October 22 2005 No: 738 Why blurring the lines puts PCVs in danger
When the National Call to Service legislation was amended to include Peace Corps in December of 2002, this country had not yet invaded Iraq and was not in prolonged military engagement in the Middle East, as it is now. Read the story of how one volunteer spent three years in captivity from 1976 to 1980 as the hostage of a insurrection group in Colombia in Joanne Marie Roll's op-ed on why this legislation may put soldier/PCVs in the same kind of danger. Latest: Read the ongoing dialog on the subject.

Friends of the Peace Corps 170,000  strong Date: April 2 2005 No: 543 Friends of the Peace Corps 170,000 strong
170,000 is a very special number for the RPCV community - it's the number of Volunteers who have served in the Peace Corps since 1961. It's also a number that is very special to us because March is the first month since our founding in January, 2001 that our readership has exceeded 170,000. And while we know that not everyone who comes to this site is an RPCV, they are all "Friends of the Peace Corps." Thanks everybody for making PCOL your source of news for the Returned Volunteer community.

Read the stories and leave your comments.

Some postings on Peace Corps Online are provided to the individual members of this group without permission of the copyright owner for the non-profit purposes of criticism, comment, education, scholarship, and research under the "Fair Use" provisions of U.S. Government copyright laws and they may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owner. Peace Corps Online does not vouch for the accuracy of the content of the postings, which is the sole responsibility of the copyright holder.

Story Source: Mother Jones

This story has been posted in the following forums: : Headlines; Figures; COS - Thailand; Diplomacy; Hunger


Add a Message

This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.