2008.10.23: October 23, 2008: Headlines: COS - Bolivia: Safety: COS - Panama: Personal Web site: Peace Corps Volunteer Lost and Found in Panama writes: When the news talks about the HUGE number of volunteers in Bolivia who apparently ended their relationship with Peace Corps or who were angry at the organization, they aren't giving a full picture
Peace Corps Online:
Directory:
Bolivia:
Peace Corps Bolivia :
Peace Corps Bolivia: New Stories:
2008.09.11: September 11, 2008: Headlines: COS - Bolivia: Diplomacy: Safety: Wall Street Journal: Bolivia Expels American Ambassador Philip S. Goldberg :
2008.09.15: September 15, 2008: Headlines: COS - Bolivia: Safety: Diplomacy: CNN: Peace Corps temporarily suspends operations in Bolivia because of "growing instability" :
2008.10.23: October 23, 2008: Headlines: COS - Bolivia: Safety: Service: Washington Post: Some Peace Corps Volunteers return to Bolivia on their own to complete the projects they have started :
2008.10.23: October 23, 2008: Headlines: COS - Bolivia: Safety: COS - Panama: Personal Web site: Peace Corps Volunteer Lost and Found in Panama writes: When the news talks about the HUGE number of volunteers in Bolivia who apparently ended their relationship with Peace Corps or who were angry at the organization, they aren't giving a full picture
Peace Corps Volunteer Lost and Found in Panama writes: When the news talks about the HUGE number of volunteers in Bolivia who apparently ended their relationship with Peace Corps or who were angry at the organization, they aren't giving a full picture
"I'm so proud of the people who chose to go back to tie things up, or stay in their sites and work for a while longer. It says a lot about those people, and (in my opinion) how important their Peace Corps experience was to them. For us transfers, that was an unfortunate draw-back. Many of us would have loved to have gone back to Bolivia for a week and THEN go to another country, but it was not an option because the government is still obligated to protect us as volunteers, and Bolivia isn't safe enough for them to let any current volunteer visit. I would encourage the Press to give a more rounded version of the story. They probably can't find a current volunteer willing to give an interview (we're not supposed to, for our safety and privacy), unfortunately, but the least they could do is research more of the post-Close of Service options and reasons behind taking this path. Then the numbers might not look so dramatic. But then again, what is the Press if not Drama? Not News...certainly not! "
Peace Corps Volunteer Lost and Found in Panama writes: When the news talks about the HUGE number of volunteers in Bolivia who apparently ended their relationship with Peace Corps or who were angry at the organization, they aren't giving a full picture
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Caption: Former Peace Corps volunteer Cooper Swanson, 24, teaches his students computer basics at the all-girls Catholic boarding school in Mizque.Swanson decided to return to Bolivia on his own after being evacuated by the Peace Corps due to security concerns because he wanted to finish the work he had started there as a volunteer. Photo: Evan Abramson-The Washington Post
Inflation..I'm sick of it
So reading an article sent to me by my father and a good friend, regarding the evacuation/aftermath of the PC Bolivia volunteers, I had rabies (well, that's a translation of a way of saying you were super crazy mad) to put some things into the light. May I add the following (of course from my own point of view, but we were all going through this together in one place, and I heard a lot of talking volunteers, discussing their options, hopes and fears)...
The Peace Corps team from Washington, D.C. was extremely helpful in the decision-making process, never forcing us to take a transfer, because it is not wise to make life decisions during stressful events, or to make them in a short period of time. Many of my compañeros weren't ready to make that decision to jump into a new culture, program, and country without our familiar surroundings and friends. And it wasn't a rejection of Peace Corps, for anybody that I talked to. It was a need for time and closure, whether in Bolivia or in the U.S. Sometimes I wonder whether it's something I should have taken more time to think about, and had I done so, I would have had to close my service and re-enroll for 27 months, thus being counted among the "PC rejectors." We had a wonderful counselor to help us with the tough stuff, and we had placement officers who helped us with knowing exactly how sure we would be about getting placed to a new, satisfactory post if we so chose, once we had sorted our thoughts out in the U.S. (or on a super-sweet South American vacation using some of the money we'd earned as volunteers...it's not much, so why not spend it somewhere less expensive and really interesting).
More than half the volunteers had LESS than a year left in service (some were a MONTH away from their full commitment of 2 years), and it wouldn't make sense for those people to add a new 1 or 2 year commitment just to keep being in Peace Corps. To me, that makes sense that they wouldn't hurry to another country, but rather go back to Bolivia to tie up their loose ends and maybe make arrangements for almost-done projects to be completed. Again, not a rejection of peace corps or a statement against the organization, rather a logical decision.
There is a good number of people who are planning on doing another WHOLE 27 MONTHS. those people had to close their service, which inflates the number of "not continuing" members.
Some COS-ed people are interested in Peace Corps Response, which places returned volunteers in short-term high-involvement projects to accomplish a specific goal, often in response to a major crisis (this used to be called Crisis Corps). to be eligible for PCR, you need to close your service, then re-apply from home.
Some people with recent injuries could not transfer, because their medical clearance would take longer than the few weeks that would remain before moving to the new country. That's unfortunate, but those people could still do Peace Corps in the future, and I know some really fought for the chance to transfer. Were they rejecting the organization? This might be the only small group of "angry" volunteers, but they were angry that they couldn't continue right away, because they still wanted to be volunteers.
All the people who ended their service have "Returned Peace Corps Volunteer" status. It's like they're veterans. Are those who end their military tours of duty rejecting the U.S. military? They are honored as veterans, and hold that status for life. Though the military and Peace Corps are clearly different, I do see a comparison. An RPCV continues as such, as a part of the organization, and can choose to be an active RPCV, visiting schools, participating in events, etc. It's an honor for many people to say they are RPCV. I don't think most of these people would be considered as mad at the organization.
So as you can see, when the news talks about the HUGE number who apparently ended their relationship with Peace Corps or who were angry at the organization, they aren't giving a full picture. Why paint it in this negative light? I'm glad the Washington Post today did add more to the story about back-to-Bolivia volunteers. I'm so proud of the people who chose to go back to tie things up, or stay in their sites and work for a while longer. It says a lot about those people, and (in my opinion) how important their Peace Corps experience was to them. For us transfers, that was an unfortunate draw-back. Many of us would have loved to have gone back to Bolivia for a week and THEN go to another country, but it was not an option because the government is still obligated to protect us as volunteers, and Bolivia isn't safe enough for them to let any current volunteer visit.
I would encourage the Press to give a more rounded version of the story. They probably can't find a current volunteer willing to give an interview (we're not supposed to, for our safety and privacy), unfortunately, but the least they could do is research more of the post-Close of Service options and reasons behind taking this path. Then the numbers might not look so dramatic. But then again, what is the Press if not Drama? Not News...certainly not!
Links to Related Topics (Tags):
Headlines: October, 2008; Peace Corps Bolivia; Directory of Bolivia RPCVs; Messages and Announcements for Bolivia RPCVs; Safety and Security of Volunteers; Peace Corps Panama; Directory of Panama RPCVs; Messages and Announcements for Panama RPCVs
When this story was posted in October 2008, this was on the front page of PCOL:
Peace Corps Online The Independent News Forum serving Returned Peace Corps Volunteers
| Peace Corps Suspends Program in Bolivia Turmoil began in Bolivia three weeks ago sparked by President Evo Morales' pledge to redistribute wealth from the east to the country's poorer highlands. Peace Corps has withdrawn all volunteers from the country because of "growing instability." Morales has thrown out US Ambassador Philip Goldberg accusing the American government of inciting the violence. This is not the first controversy surrounding Goldberg's tenure as US ambassador to Bolivia. |
Read the stories and leave your comments.
Some postings on Peace Corps Online are provided to the individual members of this group without permission of the copyright owner for the non-profit purposes of criticism, comment, education, scholarship, and research under the "Fair Use" provisions of U.S. Government copyright laws and they may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owner. Peace Corps Online does not vouch for the accuracy of the content of the postings, which is the sole responsibility of the copyright holder.
Story Source: Personal Web site
This story has been posted in the following forums: : Headlines; COS - Bolivia; Safety; COS - Panama
PCOL42336
44