2009.02.27: February 27, 2009: Headlines: COS - Afghanistan: COS - Pakistan: COS - India: Speaking Out: Far Eastern Economic Review: India RPCV Frank Schell writes: How to Win the 'Af-Pak' War

Peace Corps Online: Directory: Afghanistan: Peace Corps Afghanistan: Peace Corps Afghanistan: Newest Stories: 2009.02.27: February 27, 2009: Headlines: COS - Afghanistan: COS - Pakistan: COS - India: Speaking Out: Far Eastern Economic Review: India RPCV Frank Schell writes: How to Win the 'Af-Pak' War

By Admin1 (admin) (151.196.46.155) on Saturday, March 14, 2009 - 1:49 pm: Edit Post

India RPCV Frank Schell writes: How to Win the 'Af-Pak' War

India RPCV Frank Schell writes: How to Win the 'Af-Pak' War

Before more resources are allocated to this region, the U.S. needs to be realistic about what the objective is and exactly how complicated the forces aligned against us are. Initially the mission was to get Osama bin Laden, dead or alive. When that was not successful, it morphed into the exportation of democracy to a feudal and barren land, known more for Bactrian camels and lapis lazuli than much else. Then protecting the fledgling government of Hamid Karzai became the dominant strain, and finally, the need to prevent further Balkanization or disintegration in South Asia—all the while eradicating a principal cash crop of the rural people, the poppy, often worth more per acre than wheat. Right now the U.S. is trapped in a lattice work of misguided or overwrought objectives, fighting a war by matrix in which the burdens of NATO coalition members are terribly unequal.

India RPCV Frank Schell writes: How to Win the 'Af-Pak' War

How to Win the 'Af-Pak' War

by Frank Schell

Posted February 27. 2009

The bones of Alexander’s men lie deep in Afghanistan. The Mughals, a Turkic dynasty established in India in the early 16th century that later adopted the Persian language, could not with their affinity subdue the Turkic and Persian tribes in the region. The bleak, mountainous land was unkind to the British Raj during a series of Anglo-Afghan wars that started in 1839 and ended 80 years later. The Soviet invasion of 1979 was seen as a nine year immersion into Afghan hell for its army. And now, under the Obama administration, the U.S. is preparing to commit more troops, with little to show for some 3,300 casualties and the expenditure of more than $173 billion since 9/11.

Before more resources are allocated to this region, the U.S. needs to be realistic about what the objective is and exactly how complicated the forces aligned against us are. Initially the mission was to get Osama bin Laden, dead or alive. When that was not successful, it morphed into the exportation of democracy to a feudal and barren land, known more for Bactrian camels and lapis lazuli than much else. Then protecting the fledgling government of Hamid Karzai became the dominant strain, and finally, the need to prevent further Balkanization or disintegration in South Asia—all the while eradicating a principal cash crop of the rural people, the poppy, often worth more per acre than wheat. Right now the U.S. is trapped in a lattice work of misguided or overwrought objectives, fighting a war by matrix in which the burdens of NATO coalition members are terribly unequal.

Afghanistan and Pakistan share a 1,600 mile “border" that is not truly a border, declared the Durand Line in 1893. Neither country has control of this artificial frontier, and it was never acknowledged by the 42 million Pashtun peoples that live on both sides of it. While many Pashtun are significantly pro-Taliban, they have also wanted their own country for many years. Some of the areas where they reside such as the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (including the Taliban-controlled Swat Valley), and Northwest Frontier Province of Pakistan are beyond the control of any sovereign government already. The Taliban and al Qaeda are not the only enemy: Pashtun ethnic nationalism is lined up against the coalition too. Afghanistan and Pakistan are effectively one country in the war against Islamic jihad.

The objective must be redefined as preventing nuclear arms from falling into the hands of the Taliban, al Qaeda or their surrogates in the region. This will resonate with the American people and our allies far more than most of the previous rationales. The U.S. must respect the history of a region that has been the demise of empires and recognize the futility of beginning the democratic process where there is no middle class to start with.

India, a secular democracy with 150 million Muslims that are generally Indians first, ethnic and religious affinities following, should be brought to the table. The dangers of Hindu-Muslim communal conflict have been the case in India, long before Islamic jihad became a global brand, and India is vulnerable from within. With historical and cultural ties to Persia among the Islamic influences entering the subcontinent, India has massive economic and military presence that it can bring to bear, pressuring Pakistan to align itself with India and the West, or with the forces of darkness that, in the recent words of its defense minister, A.K. Anthony, are a threat to humanity and civilization.

Pakistan must be told to shut down the radical clerics and madrassas and stand and fight for its life—and stop feeding the crocodile, in Winston Churchill’s famous analogy. The U.S. can help build Pakistan’s counterinsurgency capability, since its army has been configured mainly to take on India over the past sixty years and is not believed sufficiently trained for the CI task at hand. Finally, Saudi Arabia should be engaged as a benefactor and reconstructionist party, given its financial support of the mujahideen against the Soviets and its potential moral authority.

The U.S. cannot rely on a regional solution that embraces China and Russia. China’s priorities include helping the stability of U.S. Treasury markets, limiting the damage to its export driven economic model, and building its infrastructure and blue water navy. And Russia, still angry about its fall from empire, would rather invade Georgia, menace the Ukraine and cut off its natural gas to Europe, get the U.S. kicked out of Kyrghystan, and conduct naval exercises with Hugo Chavez.

The U.S. does not have to be on its own in “Af-Pak,” as it is now being called. But first, the new administration does have to define the right objective there.

Frank Schell recently returned from a fact-finding mission to India with the Harris School of Public Policy Studies at the University of Chicago, where he is a member of the Dean’s International Council. A former banking executive, he served in the U.S. Peace Corps in India, speaks Hindi-Urdu, and is on the editorial board of the Chicago-based National Strategy Forum, which focuses on national security issues.




Links to Related Topics (Tags):

Headlines: February, 2009; Peace Corps Afghanistan; Directory of Afghanistan RPCVs; Messages and Announcements for Afghanistan RPCVs; Peace Corps Pakistan; Directory of Pakistan RPCVs; Messages and Announcements for Pakistan RPCVs; Peace Corps India; Directory of India RPCVs; Messages and Announcements for India RPCVs; Speaking Out





When this story was posted in March 2009, this was on the front page of PCOL:




Peace Corps Online The Independent News Forum serving Returned Peace Corps Volunteers RSS Feed

 Site Index Search PCOL with Google Contact PCOL Recent Posts Bulletin Board Open Discussion RPCV Directory Register

PCOL's Candidate for Peace Corps Director Date: December 2 2008 No: 1288 PCOL's Candidate for Peace Corps Director
Honduras RPCV Jon Carson, 33, presided over thousands of workers as national field director for the Obama campaign and said the biggest challenge -- and surprise -- was the volume of volunteer help, including more than 15,000 "super volunteers," who were a big part of what made Obama's campaign so successful. PCOL endorses Jon Carson as the man who can revitalize the Peace Corps, bring it into the internet age, and meet Obama's goal of doubling the size of the Peace Corps by 2011.

Director Ron Tschetter:  The PCOL Interview Date: December 9 2008 No: 1296 Director Ron Tschetter: The PCOL Interview
Peace Corps Director Ron Tschetter sat down for an in-depth interview to discuss the evacuation from Bolivia, political appointees at Peace Corps headquarters, the five year rule, the Peace Corps Foundation, the internet and the Peace Corps, how the transition is going, and what the prospects are for doubling the size of the Peace Corps by 2011. Read the interview and you are sure to learn something new about the Peace Corps. PCOL previously did an interview with Director Gaddi Vasquez.

Feb 22, 2009: Return to Indonesia? Date: March 1 2009 No: 1333 Feb 22, 2009: Return to Indonesia?
Clinton says PC expects to resume in Indonesia 18 Feb
Indonesia still touchy about Peace Corps 17 Feb
PCVs Remain Safe in Madagascar 30 Jan
Dodd's Senate seat up for grabs? 21 Feb
Tony Hall Talks About Poverty and Hunger 18 Feb
Pro Football Player Aaron Merz to serve in Zambia 17 Feb
Moyers could be new Murrow for US Public Diplomacy 17 Feb
Obituary for Nigeria CD Francis Underhill Macy 10 Feb
George Packer writes: Parties argue government role 10 Feb
James Rupert writes: Missile Strikes Counterproductive? 10 Feb
Danny Hevrol in Madagascar amidst fighting 6 Feb
Reed Hastings writes: Please Raise My Taxes 6 Feb
Obama overrides Hillary on Chris Hill appointment 6 Feb
Joseph Acaba has "The Right Stuff" 4 Feb
Maureen Orth writes: A New Start 2 Feb
Henry Rayburn could make art out of anything 1 Feb
Obama out to marry military power with diplomacy 30 Jan
Mike Fay honored by the San Diego Zoo 30 Jan
Charles Stroh writes: Karzai seen as impediment to change 29 Jan
Madeleine Meek writes: The market and the bath 26 Jan
NPCA gets new Web Site 22 Jan
Read more stories from January and February 2009.

Some PCVs return to Bolivia on their own Date: October 23 2008 No: 1279 Some PCVs return to Bolivia on their own
Peace Corps has withdrawn all volunteers from Bolivia because of "growing instability" and the expulsion of US Ambassador Philip Goldberg after Bolivian President Evo Morales accused the American government of inciting violence in the country. This is not the first controversy surrounding Goldberg's tenure as US ambassador to Bolivia. Latest: Some volunteers have returned to Bolivia on their own to complete their projects.



Read the stories and leave your comments.








Some postings on Peace Corps Online are provided to the individual members of this group without permission of the copyright owner for the non-profit purposes of criticism, comment, education, scholarship, and research under the "Fair Use" provisions of U.S. Government copyright laws and they may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owner. Peace Corps Online does not vouch for the accuracy of the content of the postings, which is the sole responsibility of the copyright holder.

Story Source: Far Eastern Economic Review

This story has been posted in the following forums: : Headlines; COS - Afghanistan; COS - Pakistan; COS - India; Speaking Out

PCOL42964
64


Add a Message


This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Username:  
Password:
E-mail: