2008.10.01: October 1, 2008: Headlines: COS - Mexico: Animals: Biology: Environment: BioOne: Mexico PCV Ben Lenth writes: The Effects of Dogs on Wildlife Communities
Peace Corps Online:
Directory:
Mexico:
Peace Corps Mexico :
Peace Corps Mexico: Newest Stories:
2009.09.02: September 2, 2009: Headlines: COS - Mexico: Environment: Wet Mountain Tribune: Mexico RPCV Ben Lenth is the new Land Protection Specialist at San Isabel Land Protection Trust (SILPT) :
2008.10.01: October 1, 2008: Headlines: COS - Mexico: Animals: Biology: Environment: BioOne: Mexico PCV Ben Lenth writes: The Effects of Dogs on Wildlife Communities
Mexico PCV Ben Lenth writes: The Effects of Dogs on Wildlife Communities
Ben Lenth received a BA in Biology from Wesleyan University and an MS in Ecology from Colorado State University. He is currently a Peace Corps volunteer in Mexico, working in the Sierra Gorda Biosphere Reserve with a local NGO, the Grupo Ecolσgico Sierra Gorda.
Mexico PCV Ben Lenth writes: The Effects of Dogs on Wildlife Communities
The Effects of Dogs on Wildlife Communities
Benjamin E. Lentha,1,2, Richard L. Knighta, Mark E. Brennanb
aDepartment of Forest, Rangeland & Watershed Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1472
bBoulder County Parks and Open Space, 5201 St. Vrain Rd., Longmont, CO 80503
1 Corresponding author: Ben.Lenth@gmail.com
2 Current address: Grupo Ecolσgico Sierra Gorda, Carlos Septiem Garcia #46, Col. Cimatario, C.P. 76030, Querιtaro, Mιxico
Ben Lenth received a BA in Biology from Wesleyan University and an MS in Ecology from Colorado State University. He is currently a Peace Corps volunteer in Mexico, working in the Sierra Gorda Biosphere Reserve with a local NGO, the Grupo Ecolσgico Sierra Gorda.
Rick Knight is a professor of wildlife conservation at Colorado State University. His interests deal with land use and land health in the American West.
Mark Brennan is a wildlife biologist with Boulder County Parks and Open Space. He has a BS in Ecology and an MS in Wildlife Sciences. His interests are in the impacts of urbanization and recreation on wildlife communities and the management of modified habitats for wildlife.
Abstract
Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are frequent visitors to protected areas, but little is known about how they affect wildlife communities. We studied the effects of dogs on wildlife communities by comparing the activity levels of wildlife in areas that prohibited dogs with areas that allowed dogs. We measured wildlife activity on trails and up to 200 m away from trails using five methods: (1) pellet plots, (2) track plates, (3) remote triggered cameras, (4) on-trail scat surveys, and (5) mapping prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) burrow locations. The presence of dogs along recreational trails correlated with altered patterns of habitat utilization by several species. Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) activity was significantly lower within 100 m of trails in areas that allowed dogs than in areas that prohibited dogs. Small mammals, including squirrels (Sciurus spp.) and rabbits (Sylvilagus spp.), also exhibited reduced levels of activity within 50 m of trails in areas that allowed dogs when compared with areas without. The density of prairie dog burrows was lower within 25 m of trails in areas that allowed dogs. The presence of dogs also affected carnivore activity. Bobcat (Felis rufus) detections were lower in areas that allowed dogs, and red fox (Vulpes vulpes) detections were higher. These findings have implications for the management of natural areas, particularly those that allow dogs to be off-leash.
Keywords: domestic dogs, mule deer, protected area management, recreation, recreational trails
LITERATURE CITED
Allen, J.J., M. Bekoff, and R.L. Crabtree. 1999. An observational study of coyote (Canis latrans) scent-marking and territoriality in Yellowstone National Park. Ethology 105:289302. CrossRef, CSA
[APPMA] American Pet Products Manufactures Association2007. 20072008 APPMA National Pet Owners Survey. American Pet Products Manufacturers Association. Greenwich, Conn.
Bauer, M. 2004. Recreation conflict at six Boulder County Parks and Open Space Properties: a baseline study. Boulder County Parks and Open Space. Longmont, Colo.
Bekoff, M. 1979. Scent-marking by free-ranging domestic dogs olfactory and visual components. Biology of Behavior 4:123139.
Bekoff, M. and R. Ickes. 1999. Behavioral interactions and conflict among domestic dogs, black-tailed prairie dogs, and people in Boulder, Colorado. Anthrozoos 12:105110.
Bekoff, M. and C. Meaney. 1997. Interactions among dogs, people and the environment in Boulder, Colorado: a case study. Anthrozoos 10:2331.
Brown, D.G., K.M. Johnson, T.R. Loveland, and D.M. Theobald. 2005. Rural landuse trends in the conterminous United States, 19502000. Ecological Applications 15:18511863. CrossRef
Butler, J.R.A., J.T. du Toit, and J.A. Bingham. 2004. Free-ranging domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) as predators and prey in rural Zimbabwe: threats of competition and disease to large wild carnivores. Biological Conservation 115:369378. CrossRef, CSA
Causey, M.K. and C.A. Cude. 1978. Feral dog predation of the gopher tortoise in Southeast Alabama. Herpetological Review 9:9495.
Collins, W.B. 1981. Habitat preferences of mule deer as rated by pellet-group distributions. Journal of Wildlife Management 45:969972. CrossRef, CSA
Coppinger, R. and L. Coppinger. 2001. Dogs: a Startling New Understanding of Canine Origin, Behavior, and Evolution. Scribner. New York.
Cutler, T.L. and D.E. Swann. 1999. Using remote photography in wildlife ecology: a review. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27:571581.
Daniels, T.J. and M. Bekoff. 1989. Spatial and temporal resource use by feral and abandoned dogs. Ethology 81:300312.
Fitzgerald, J.P., C.A. Meaney, and D.M. Armstrong. 1994. Mammals of Colorado. University of Colorado Press. Niwot.
Forrest, A. and C.C. St. Clair. 2006. Effect of dog leash laws and habitat type on avian and small mammal communities in urban parks. Urban Ecosystems 9:5166.
Fox, M.W. 1971. Behaviour of Wolves, Dogs and Related Canids. Harper and Row. New York.
George, S. and K Crooks. 2006. Recreation and large mammal activity in an urban nature reserve. Biological Conservation 133:107117. CrossRef
Glennon, M.J., W.F. Porter, and C.L. Demers. 2002. An alternative field technique for estimating diversity of small-mammal populations. Journal of Mammalogy 83:734742. Bioone, CSA
Gorman, M.L. and B.J. Trowbridge. 1989. The role of odor in the social lives of carnivores. Pp 5788. in Gittleman, J.L., editor. ed. Carnivore Behavior, Ecology and Evolution. Cornell University Press. Ithaca, N.Y.
Green, J.S. and J. Flinders. 1981. Diameter and pH comparisons of coyote and red fox scats. Journal of Wildlife Management 45:765767. CrossRef
Halfpenny, J.C. 2001. Scats and Tracks of the Rocky Mountains. 2nd edGlobe Pequot Press. Guilford, Conn.
Henry, J.D. 1977. Use of urine marking in scavenging behavior of red foxes, Vulpes vulpes. Behaviour 61:82106.
Holling, C.S. and C.R. Allen. 2002. Adaptive inference for distinguishing credible from incredible patterns in nature. Ecosystems 5:319328. CrossRef, CSA
Johnson, M.K. and R.C. Belden. 1984. Differentiating mountain lion and bobcat scats. Journal of Wildlife Management 48:239244. CrossRef, CSA
Johnson, W.C. and S.K. Collinge. 2004. Landscape effects on black-tailed prairie dog colonies. Biological Conservation 115:487497. CrossRef, CSA
Knight, R.L. and D. Cole. 1995. Wildlife responses to recreationists. Pp 5169. in Knight, R.L. and D. Cole, editors. eds. Wildlife and Recreationists: Coexistence Through Management and Research. Island Press. Washington D.C.
Knight, R.L. and K.J. Gutzwiller, editors. (eds.). 1995. Wildlife and Recreationists: Coexistence Through Management and Research. Island Press. Washington, D.C.
Kohn, M.H, E.C. York, D.A. Kamradt, G. Haught, R.M. Sauvajot, and R.K. Wayne. 1999. Estimating population size by genotyping faeces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 266:657663. CrossRef
Laurenson, K., C. Sillero-Zubiri, H. Thompson, F. Shiferaw, S. Thirgood, and J. Malcolm. 1998. Disease as a threat to endangered species: Ethiopian wolves, domestic dogs and canine pathogens. Animal Conservation 1:273280. CrossRef
Lima, S.L. 1998. Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions: what are the ecological effects of anti-predator decision-making. Bioscience 48:2534. CrossRef, CSA
Lowry, D.A. and K.L. McArthur. 1978. Domestic dogs as predators on deer. Wildlife Society Bulletin 6:3839.
MacArthur, R.A., V. Geist, and R.H. Johnston. 1982. Cardiac and behavioral responses of mountain sheep to human disturbance. Journal of Wildlife Management 46:351358. CrossRef, CSA
Maestas, J.D., R.L. Knight, and W.C. Gilgert. 2003. Biodiversity across a rural land-use gradient. Conservation Biology 24:3642.
Major, J.T. and J.A. Sherburne. 1987. Interspecific relationships of coyotes, bobcats and red foxes in western Maine. Journal of Wildlife Management 51:606616. CrossRef, CSA
Manning, R.E., N.L. Ballinger, J. Marion, and J. Roggenbuck. 1996. Recreation management in natural areas: problems and practices, status and trends. Natural Areas Journal 16:142146.
Mengel, R.M. 1971. A study of dog-coyote hybrids and implications concerning hybridization in Canis. Journal of Mammalogy 52:316336.
Mertz, S. 2002. Compliance with Leave No Trace frontcountry principles a preliminary examination of visitor behavior. City of Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks. Boulder, Colo.
Miller, J.E. and B.D. Leopold. 1992. Population influences: predators. Pp 119128. in Dickson, J.G., editor. ed. The Wild Turkey: Biology and Management. Stackpole Books. Mechanicsburg, Pa.
Miller, S.G., R.L. Knight, and C.K. Miller. 2001. Wildlife response to pedestrians and dogs. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:124132. CSA
Odell, E. and R.L. Knight. 2001. Songbird and medium-sized mammal communities associated with exurban development in Pitkin County, Colorado. Conservation Biology 15:11431150. CrossRef, CSA
Ott, R.L. and M. Longnecker. 2001. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. 5th edDuxbury. Pacific Grove, Calif.
Peters, G. and W.C. Wozencraft. 1989. Acoustic communication by fissiped carnivores. Pp 1456. in Gittleman, J.L., editor. ed. Carnivore Behavior, Ecology and Evolution. Cornell University Press. Ithaca, N.Y.
Powell, K.L., R.J. Robel, K.E. Kemp, and M.D. Nellis. 1994. Aboveground counts of black-tailed prairie dogs temporal nature and relationship to burrow entrance density. Journal of Wildlife Management 58:351355.
Ripple, W.J. and R.L. Beschta. 2004. Wolves and the ecology of fear: can predation risk structure ecosystems. Bioscience 54:755766. CrossRef
Sargeant, G.A., D.H. Johnson, and W.E. Berg. 1998. Interpreting carnivore scent-station surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:12351245. CrossRef, CSA
Sargeant, G.A., D.H. Johnson, and W.E. Berg. 2003. Sampling designs for carnivore scent-station surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 67:289298. CrossRef
SAS, Institute. 1999. SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 8.0. SAS Institute. Cary, N.C.
Scott, M.D. and K. Causey. 1973. Ecology of feral dogs in Alabama. Journal of Wildlife Management 37:253265. CrossRef
Serpell, J. 1995. The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behavior and Interactions With People. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, U.K.
Sime, C.A. 1999. Domestic dogs in wildlife habitats. Pp 8.18.17. in Joslin, G. and H. Youmans, editors. coordinators. Effects of recreation on Rocky Mountain wildlife: a review for Montana. Committee on Effects of Recreation on Wildlife, Montana Chapter of The Wildlife Society. Helena, Mont.
Soulι, M.E., J.A. Estes, B. Miller, and D.L. Honnold. 2005. Strongly interacting species: conservation policy, management, and ethics. Bioscience 55:168176. Bioone
Taylor, A.R. and R L. Knight. 2003. Wildlife responses to recreation and associated visitor perceptions. Ecological Applications 13:951963. CrossRef, CSA
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service1999. South Florida multi-species recovery plan. Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlanta, Ga.
Watson, A.E., D.N. Cole, D.L. Turner, and P.S. Reynolds. 2000. Wilderness recreation use estimation: a handbook of methods and systems. General Technical Report RMRSGTR-56, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah.
Whittaker, D. and R.L. Knight. 1999. Understanding wildlife responses to humans. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26:312317.
Woolf, A. and G.F. Hubert Jr.. 1998. Status and management of bobcats in the United States over three decades: 1970s1990s. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26:287293.
Links to Related Topics (Tags):
Headlines: October, 2008; Peace Corps Mexico; Directory of Mexico RPCVs; Messages and Announcements for Mexico RPCVs; Animals; Biology; Environment
When this story was posted in September 2009, this was on the front page of PCOL:
Peace Corps Online The Independent News Forum serving Returned Peace Corps Volunteers 








 | Memo to Incoming Director Williams PCOL has asked five prominent RPCVs and Staff to write a memo on the most important issues facing the Peace Corps today. Issues raised include the independence of the Peace Corps, political appointments at the agency, revitalizing the five-year rule, lowering the ET rate, empowering volunteers, removing financial barriers to service, increasing the agency's budget, reducing costs, and making the Peace Corps bureaucracy more efficient and responsive. Latest: Greetings from Director Williams |
 | Director Ron Tschetter: The PCOL Interview Peace Corps Director Ron Tschetter sat down for an in-depth interview to discuss the evacuation from Bolivia, political appointees at Peace Corps headquarters, the five year rule, the Peace Corps Foundation, the internet and the Peace Corps, how the transition is going, and what the prospects are for doubling the size of the Peace Corps by 2011. Read the interview and you are sure to learn something new about the Peace Corps. PCOL previously did an interview with Director Gaddi Vasquez. |
Read the stories and leave your comments.
Some postings on Peace Corps Online are provided to the individual members of this group without permission of the copyright owner for the non-profit purposes of criticism, comment, education, scholarship, and research under the "Fair Use" provisions of U.S. Government copyright laws and they may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owner. Peace Corps Online does not vouch for the accuracy of the content of the postings, which is the sole responsibility of the copyright holder.
Story Source: BioOne
This story has been posted in the following forums: : Headlines; COS - Mexico; Animals; Biology; Environment
PCOL44928
19