2008.01.12: January 12, 2008: Headlines: Criticism: The Moderate Voice: Jeb Koogler writes: The Peace Corps might consider focusing a little less on young people, and a little more on increasing their recruitment from an older, more experienced crowd
Peace Corps Online:
Peace Corps News:
Peace Corps Library:
Criticism of the Peace Corps:
January 23, 2005: Index: PCOL Exclusive: Criticism:
2008.01.12: January 12, 2008: Headlines: Criticism: The Moderate Voice: Jeb Koogler writes: The Peace Corps might consider focusing a little less on young people, and a little more on increasing their recruitment from an older, more experienced crowd
Jeb Koogler writes: The Peace Corps might consider focusing a little less on young people, and a little more on increasing their recruitment from an older, more experienced crowd
The fact is, the “effectiveness” of the young recruits is not as paramount as Strauss cracks it up to be — the Peace Corps is as much about bridging divides between people and lessening stereotypes as it is about efficiently completing its development tasks (i.e. teaching English, building schools, etc.). Don’t get me wrong: the Peace Corps should ensure that they’re hiring competent people and placing them in positions where they can make a difference. But the group’s purpose is also, perhaps just as much, about developing relationships across cultures. In effect, it’s as much about the human connections as it is about the actual work. In this regard, the energy and attitude of young people can be an invaluable asset.
Jeb Koogler writes: The Peace Corps might consider focusing a little less on young people, and a little more on increasing their recruitment from an older, more experienced crowd
Too Many Young People?
by Jeb Koogler
That’s what Robert L. Strauss, a former Peace Corps country director, believes has gone badly wrong with Kennedy’s organization:
…even if the Peace Corps reaches its goal of having 15 percent of its volunteers over 50, the overwhelming majority will remain recently minted college graduates. And too often these young volunteers lack the maturity and professional experience to be effective development workers in the 21st century.
This wasn’t the case in 1961 when the Peace Corps sent its first volunteers overseas. Back then, enthusiastic young Americans offered something that many newly independent nations counted in double and even single digits: college graduates. But today, those same nations have millions of well-educated citizens of their own desperately in need of work. So it’s much less clear what inexperienced Americans have to offer. (The New York Times)
To a certain extent, Strauss is right: the Peace Corps might consider focusing a little less on young people, and a little more on increasing their recruitment from an older, more experienced crowd. Greater presence of an older generation would help the program to run more smoothly, and facilitate the success of the organization’s younger recruits. But Strauss also overstates his case — in particular, he errs when he suggests that young volunteers are less valuable because they are not yet “effective development workers.”
The fact is, the “effectiveness” of the young recruits is not as paramount as Strauss cracks it up to be — the Peace Corps is as much about bridging divides between people and lessening stereotypes as it is about efficiently completing its development tasks (i.e. teaching English, building schools, etc.). Don’t get me wrong: the Peace Corps should ensure that they’re hiring competent people and placing them in positions where they can make a difference. But the group’s purpose is also, perhaps just as much, about developing relationships across cultures. In effect, it’s as much about the human connections as it is about the actual work. In this regard, the energy and attitude of young people can be an invaluable asset.
Links to Related Topics (Tags):
Headlines: January, 2008; Criticism
When this story was posted in December 2008, this was on the front page of PCOL:
Peace Corps Online The Independent News Forum serving Returned Peace Corps Volunteers
| Director Ron Tschetter: The PCOL Interview Peace Corps Director Ron Tschetter sat down for an in-depth interview to discuss the evacuation from Bolivia, political appointees at Peace Corps headquarters, the five year rule, the Peace Corps Foundation, the internet and the Peace Corps, how the transition is going, and what the prospects are for doubling the size of the Peace Corps by 2011. Read the interview and you are sure to learn something new about the Peace Corps. PCOL previously did an interview with Director Gaddi Vasquez. |
Read the stories and leave your comments.
Some postings on Peace Corps Online are provided to the individual members of this group without permission of the copyright owner for the non-profit purposes of criticism, comment, education, scholarship, and research under the "Fair Use" provisions of U.S. Government copyright laws and they may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owner. Peace Corps Online does not vouch for the accuracy of the content of the postings, which is the sole responsibility of the copyright holder.
Story Source: The Moderate Voice
This story has been posted in the following forums: : Headlines; Criticism
PCOL40408
13