|By Admin1 (admin) on Wednesday, July 23, 2003 - 10:44 am: Edit Post
Send in the Peace Corps?
"Today the war on terror guides America's foreign policy, and it is all-encompassing. No nation is totally immune from danger. If it only allowed its volunteers in safe, stable countries, the Peace Corps would risk being shut out of too much of the world. The security situations in these countries may not change, but the Peace Corps can.Returned Peace Corps Volunteers have been discussing when the Peace Corps should return to Afghanistan at:
Unfortunately, the Peace Corps removes its volunteers just when they are needed the most: when anti-Americanism is running unchecked and the need for contact with ordinary American citizens is greatest. Volunteers who have just graduated from college may not be prepared to serve in these challenging settings. But there are surely Americans, given the right amount of training and experience, who would relish the chance."
|Sign Up for News
Peace Corps Library
Sign Up for Directory
RPCVs by COS
RPCVs by State
RPCVs by Interest
Local RPCV Groups
Return to COS
Safety of PCVs
The Third Goal
US Peace Corps
USA Freedom Corps
|Top Stories and Breaking News
Call Now - Disaster ahead for PC Budget 21 July
PC to get $49M less than requested 17 July
House passes Peace Corps Charter Bill 16 July
House Set to Vote on new PC Bill 16 July
Sen. Coleman's Speech at PC HQ 15 July
Peace Corps mum on PCV death 15 July
Sen. Coleman to push for PC accountability 15 July
Call Congress - PC Funding in Trouble 15 July
Kevin Quigley Named new NPCA President 14 July
RPCV says US will find WMD in Iraq 13 July
President Bush meets PCVs in Botswana 12 July
House to consider Peace Corps Bill 11 July
Kennedy and the Third Goal 11 July
FDA orders Lariam warning 10 July
RPCV Artist exhibits at Corcoran in DC 10 July
Volunteer Zack Merrill dies in Mali 8 July
Friends of Liberia issue call to action 8 July
PCV says Bush to visit Goree Island 4 July
RPCV gives the Indian River a voice 2 July
Election Results in for NPCA Board 1 July
Tony Gasbarro honored with Carter Award 1 July
|PCOL Magazine: July Issue
A Volunteer's Courage: Health Care for RPCVs
Issues with the Peace Corps Bill in Congress
Americorps' Failure: Lessons for the Peace Corps
RPCVs dump ton of coal at US Capital
German Peace Corps celebrates 40 years
Bill Moyers talks about America's Future
More Feature Stories
Protest at the Peace Corps
Returned Volunteers honor Jack Vaughn
Alcohol Abuse a big issue for PCVs in Central Asia
Peace Corps to add 1,000 AIDS/HIV volunteers
Op-ed: The Future of the Peace Corps
Marine Sergeant says PC is "truly hardcore"
RPCV is wheelchair basketball champion
Watch Director Vasquez on web tv
Malian President Touré Speaks at PC HQ
The Shrivers: A Special Legacy
|Previous Issues and Special Reports
Exclusive: How RPCVs organized anti-war Ad
Improvements needed in Volunteer Support
From Russia with Love
Health Concerns: The Controversy over Lariam
GAO Reports on PCV Safety and Security
The Digital Freedom Initiative
PC/Washington: Senior Staff Appointments at PC HQ
PC Expansion: The Numbers Game?
Op-ed: Why Peace Corps needs Shriver's 4th Goal
When should PC return to Afghanistan?
RPCV Spy dies in Moscow
Op-ed: The Case for Peace Corps Independence
Preservation of an Independent Peace Corps
For the Peace Corps Fallen
|By bankass.com on Friday, August 15, 2003 - 10:33 am: Edit Post
If you want to go Avi you go. By the way, your pay will be volunteer pay. Thanks for your article. Daniel
|By mike osborn (majoroz) on Tuesday, August 26, 2003 - 3:07 pm: Edit Post
There are probably many areas where Peace Corps could provide a helpful function in Iraq. As retired military and RPCV, I believe I could contribute.
There are, however two severe problems:
1. I can just imagine the typical Politically Correct Yahoo PC chooses for country director trying to function in that atmosphere.
2. I would NEVER move outside my quarters without my constant companion -- calibre 9mm. As such, I would be reluctant to be titled "peace" corps
|By Mr. Colin G. Gallagher, RPCV on Sunday, August 31, 2003 - 9:08 pm: Edit Post
My past articles, posts, and radio show shorts on the general topic of threats to Peace Corps Independence have been mildly to moderately critical of our current Administration's policies on the subject, have at times elicited the written wrath of Peace Corps Washington, and have been typically technically focused and sometimes quite long. This post will be mercifully short, sweet, and to the point.
Avi M. Spiegel's article in the New York Times was just plain wrong. It was, quite frankly, exemplary of the ignorance which is more and more pervasive in U.S. culture; not so exemplary of ignorance in general -- but rather, most specifically representative of popular U.S. culture's ignorance of the growth of the worship of commodity. From the decline of journalism via embeddedment, to the failed attempts by our government to create an army of citizen informants through a program known as TIPs, to the recent attempt by Avi Speigel through journalism and the media to promulgate an idea of the mergence of Peace Corps with military efforts, a deference to a form of imperialism driven by an obsession with commodity lies at the root of the journalistic psychology of an increasing number of workers within mass media organizations.
These workers and representatives of mass media have come full circle in terms of the application of their commodity worship; first by being (like all of us) consumers and thus natural participants in a world for which economic stability rests in the protection of resource extraction, second, by wilfully promoting an agenda of a temporary political entity which obdurately pursues a goal of singular mode of resource extraction on the global level, and thirdly and finally by propagating and promulgating a dogma that would have the rest of worldwide society adapt to this goal through increasing conformity to militarism.
If, as Avi Spiegel states, "the sole face of America is too often the face of a soldier," then let us have less of the soldier, and let us never delude ourselves into believing that the goals of the peacemaker can be the same as, or even compatible with, the goals of an imperial dreadnought.
by: Mr. Colin G. Gallagher, RPCV (El Salvador)
Board Representative (MB / SC Contingent)
NorCal Peace Corps Association
cc: Avi M. Spiegel
|By Joanne Marie Roll (joey) on Thursday, September 04, 2003 - 9:20 am: Edit Post
The goal of military basic training is to condition the soldier to suppress the human inpulse to relate to another human. Instead, the soldier is trained to dehumanize the "enemy" so that, ultimately, the soldier is able to kill on command. That is what soldiers have to do.
The goal of peace corps training is to faciliate the volunteer to cross normal cultural barriers to be able to identify with and to work with those from another culture. That is what Volunteers have to do.
The two goals are mutually exclusive. I can not understand how the new Ready Reserve program will work - six months military training and service and then the rest of the obligation can be fulfilled by serving in other capacities...such as the Peace Corps. I think that is crazy making. I think this "bright idea" comes from those yahoos who run Washington and who, of course, have not served our country in any capacity.
War is the failure of peace making efforts. Peace is hard, hard work. As the daughter of a soldier,
I know, that there are times when those efforts fail and our nation's survival has depended on those brave men and women who have done the awful necessary work of war. I am so grateful that I had the opportunity to serve my country without first having to learn how to kill.
I know that there are people, including serving PCVs and RPCVS, who get up every morning and work tirelessly all day, for peace. I salute you.
Now, how can we help Carol Bellemy who is trying to do precisely that work?
|By anonymous on Thursday, September 04, 2003 - 11:44 am: Edit Post
Ready reserve is another federal program. Combining that service with Peace Corps service is not a bad idea. My experience was that x military people are not really wanted. Peace Corps volunteers are a representation of America. Military service is a reality for millions of Americans. Those Peace Corps Volunteers are just another aspect of American life.
I am again reminded that Peace Corps was basically set up like the military.
|By Anonymous (c-69-139-255-59.hsd1.pa.comcast.net - 22.214.171.124) on Friday, March 07, 2008 - 10:49 pm: Edit Post
Want to help the cause. Who do I need to speak in order to do the visa sign-off and get in country? I don't need a pay check - just want to help. Luckdragone@hotmail.com