2008.01.10: January 10, 2008: Headlines: COS - Pakistan: Figures: COS - Morocco: COS - Afghanistan: Journalism: Boston Globe: Sarah Chayes writes: Benazir Bhutto's decision to anoint her son, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, as her successor tarnishes her memory
Peace Corps Online:
Directory:
Afghanistan:
Special Report: Writer, Journalist, and AID Worker Sarah Chayes (RPCV Morocco) and her work in Afghanistan:
Sarah Chayes: Newest Stories:
2008.01.10: January 10, 2008: Headlines: COS - Pakistan: Figures: COS - Morocco: COS - Afghanistan: Journalism: Boston Globe: Sarah Chayes writes: Benazir Bhutto's decision to anoint her son, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, as her successor tarnishes her memory
Sarah Chayes writes: Benazir Bhutto's decision to anoint her son, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, as her successor tarnishes her memory
"Yet, in passing the mantle of the party she led on to her son - as if it were a family heirloom for her to dispose of as she wishes - Bhutto acted in contradiction to the very principles of democracy she claimed to incarnate. Saluted in the West for her sparkling vitality and genuine courage, the decision to anoint her son as her successor tarnishes that memory. It hamstrings the forces still struggling to establish open, civilian rule in Pakistan, and provides arguments to those in the region who believe that the very word "democracy" is just a cynical charade." Morocco RPCV Sarah Chayes has made a home in Kandahar, Afghanistan, became fluent in Pashto, one of the main Afghan languages, and devoted her energies to rebuilding a country gutted by two decades of war.
Sarah Chayes writes: Benazir Bhutto's decision to anoint her son, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, as her successor tarnishes her memory
Democracy led astray
By Sarah Chayes and Amir Soltani Sheikholeslami
January 10, 2008
A 19-YEAR-OLD scholar at Oxford University could hold the key to Pakistan's future.
At a press conference in London Tuesday, Benazir Bhutto's son, Bilawal, called for a United Nations-sponsored investigation into his mother's assassination, citing lack of transparency in Pakistan's internal investigation. Although he did not assign blame for the killing, he warned that "dictatorship feeds extremism," and added that "once the United States stops supporting dictatorship we can successfully tackle extremism."
Declaring that his mother was Pakistan's best hope but not the only hope, Bilawal proclaimed his faith in the power of the people to negate the assassin's bullet: "How many Bhuttos can you kill? From every house a Bhutto will come."
Bilawal has been catapulted into the leadership of the Pakistan People's Party by the last testament and will of his martyred mother. Although his immediate priority is to return to Oxford to "finish his education and develop enough maturity," the young democrat could not hide his feudal stripes. He defended his selection as chairman on the grounds that the party felt it important to keep a link with his mother "through the bloodline." He claimed that his position was not only unanimously endorsed by the party's central committee but also by the precedent set after the execution of his grandfather, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto.
Yet, in passing the mantle of the party she led on to her son - as if it were a family heirloom for her to dispose of as she wishes - Bhutto acted in contradiction to the very principles of democracy she claimed to incarnate. Saluted in the West for her sparkling vitality and genuine courage, the decision to anoint her son as her successor tarnishes that memory. It hamstrings the forces still struggling to establish open, civilian rule in Pakistan, and provides arguments to those in the region who believe that the very word "democracy" is just a cynical charade.
The stakes for Bhutto's son, her party, and her nation could not be higher.
Bhutto's democratic bona fides were already placed in some doubt by her willingness to be hustled by the Bush administration into a marriage of convenience with Pakistani leader Pervez Musharraf.
Since his seizure of power in a 1999 coup, Musharraf has clung to absolute control of Pakistan by all means available. Many observers doubted Bhutto's ability to wrest any real power from him on behalf of the people, and saw her re-injection into Pakistani politics as an effort by Washington to provide its autocratic ally with just enough of a democratic facade to make ongoing support of him palatable.
Nevertheless, the Bhutto name had been equated with self-determination, or at least some possibility of a transition from military to civilian rule without a religious interregnum. Appointing her young son as the party's leader - subject to the heavy-handed regency of his discredited father, Asif Zardari - can have three consequences: at best, the postponement of democratic evolution in Pakistan pending Bilawal's graduation from Oxford in several years; the besmirching and corruption of the very idea of democracy by Zardari in the meantime; or conflict within the Pakistan People's Party over the legitimacy of Bhutto's will.
Bhutto took the fourth option - the exercise of democracy - off the table by short-circuiting the mechanism any normal political party would resort to in a similar situation: an internal election to designate a political successor.
The ongoing remarkable resistance movement against Musharraf's autocratic decisions by jurists and other members of Pakistan's vibrant, educated middle class has produced several possible candidates. But now that process is paralyzed, by the grief over Bhutto's assassination and its posthumous exploitation for the benefit of opportunists acting in the name of her son. Such a paralysis plays into the hands of the most dangerous forces in Pakistan: those powers, military and religious, that mean to rule through force, fear, and deception rather than the consent of the people.
But there is a way out of this trap.
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari can live up to his illustrious name by acting as a true statesman. He should demonstrate his confidence in his party and the people of Pakistan by declining to be coronated, and calling instead for a vote to determine the leadership of his party.
Democracy in Pakistan cannot operate at the national level unless it is practiced internally by the very party that claims to bear its standard. As a self-proclaimed democrat, Bilawal can do what his mother's assassins dare not do: he can return power illegitimately obtained back to the people and, if that is his destiny, derive legitimate power from them in turn. Dynastic succession has no place in a democracy.
Sarah Chayes, a former National Public Radio reporter, is author of "Punishment of Virtue." Amir Soltani Sheikholeslami is an Iranian-American writer and human rights activist.
Links to Related Topics (Tags):
Headlines: January, 2008; RPCV Sarah Chayes (Morocco); Peace Corps Pakistan; Directory of Pakistan RPCVs; Messages and Announcements for Pakistan RPCVs; Figures; Peace Corps Morocco; Directory of Morocco RPCVs; Messages and Announcements for Morocco RPCVs; Peace Corps Afghanistan; Directory of Afghanistan RPCVs; Messages and Announcements for Afghanistan RPCVs; Journalism
When this story was posted in January 2008, this was on the front page of PCOL:
Peace Corps Online The Independent News Forum serving Returned Peace Corps Volunteers
| Dodd vows to filibuster Surveillance Act Senator Chris Dodd vowed to filibuster the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that would grant retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies that helped this administration violate the civil liberties of Americans. "It is time to say: No more. No more trampling on our Constitution. No more excusing those who violate the rule of law. These are fundamental, basic, eternal principles. They have been around, some of them, for as long as the Magna Carta. They are enduring. What they are not is temporary. And what we do not do in a time where our country is at risk is abandon them." |
| What is the greatest threat facing us now? "People will say it's terrorism. But are there any terrorists in the world who can change the American way of life or our political system? No. Can they knock down a building? Yes. Can they kill somebody? Yes. But can they change us? No. Only we can change ourselves. So what is the great threat we are facing? I would approach this differently, in almost Marshall-like terms. What are the great opportunities out there - ones that we can take advantage of?" Read more. |
Read the stories and leave your comments.
Some postings on Peace Corps Online are provided to the individual members of this group without permission of the copyright owner for the non-profit purposes of criticism, comment, education, scholarship, and research under the "Fair Use" provisions of U.S. Government copyright laws and they may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owner. Peace Corps Online does not vouch for the accuracy of the content of the postings, which is the sole responsibility of the copyright holder.
Story Source: Boston Globe
This story has been posted in the following forums: : Headlines; COS - Pakistan; Figures; COS - Morocco; COS - Afghanistan; Journalism
PCOL40301
83