September 2, 2003 - The Atlantic: Carol Bellamy's UNICEF in the crosshairs
Peace Corps Online:
Peace Corps News:
Peace Corps Headlines - 2003:
September 2003 Peace Corps Headlines:
September 2, 2003 - The Atlantic: Carol Bellamy's UNICEF in the crosshairs
Carol Bellamy's UNICEF in the crosshairs
Read and comment on this story from the Atlantic that under the leadership of former Peace Corps Director Carol Bellamy, UNICEF has shifted gears and added a sharper edge to its image with reports on sexual abuse and other often taboo subjects. She has also joined with the heads of other U.N. agencies in advocating, for example, more help for refugee women who are sexually assaulted, including the provision of a "morning after" pill for rape victims.
While UNICEF still does monumental work in inoculating, feeding and otherwise caring for children's basic needs, it is also promoting children's rights and women's rights more insistently, arguing that without healthy, educated women, children will continue to suffer helplessly in the poorest nations on Earth. This has drawn criticism from several other quarters outside and inside the agency, where Bellamy's management style has not always been collegial, according to some staff members.
Bellamy has said repeatedly that the world has changed, and so has thinking about why some countries seem predestined to fail. It is now accepted in most institutions, among them the World Bank and numerous private aid agencies, that without an improvement in women's lives, birth rates will continue to soar, children will not go to school, childhood disease will persist and younger and younger children, living in the most destructive poverty, will be vulnerable to abuses of all kinds, including slave labor and HIV-AIDS infection through forced sex.
Read this story on the new directions Carol Bellamy is taking UNICEF and the criticism UNICEF has come under at:
UNICEF in the Crosshairs*
* This link was active on the date it was posted. PCOL is not responsible for broken links which may have changed.
UNICEF in the Crosshairs
by Barbara Crossette
UNITED NATIONS—A couple of years ago, a conservative organization called the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute produced a very contentious report claiming that the U.N. Population Fund (UNFPA) was complicit in China's forced abortion policy. The report led directly to a White House decision in early 2002 to withhold the $34 million U.S. contribution to the fund that had already been appropriated by Congress. That a State Department investigative team went to China and decided the charges were unfounded didn't bother the Bush administration. The cut was made permanent, and efforts in Congress to restore some money this year were beaten back.
After succeeding in that campaign, the institute, which largely reflects Vatican policy, is now laying the groundwork for an attack on UNICEF. The agency, it argues in a new report— The United Nations Children's Fund: Women or Children First? has been taken over by radical feminists, led by Carol Bellamy, the executive director.
Let's not be ambiguous. For those of us who have watched UNICEF evolve to grapple with the ugly world of illiteracy, AIDS and abuse in which millions of children now live, this campaign against the agency is dangerous, intended to inflame and galvanize the lobby that opposes all abortions, preaches "abstinence-only" birth control and tries to block advances in women's rights at international conferences. That might not be much of a problem—since such thinking bucks world trends and modern development theory—were it not for the possibility that U.S. support for UNICEF could be put in jeopardy just as it was for the UNFPA.
UNICEF is arguably the best-known and most popular U.N. agency among Americans of all ages. It received more than $282 million from the United States last year in government and private money. Bellamy is herself American.
The threat is not hidden in this report, available in full on the institute's Web site, http://www.c-fam.org/. It concludes that "it will be necessary for donors, both individuals and nations, to demand changes at UNICEF. Donor nations, most especially the United States, must take a closer look at how their money is being spent by UNICEF." The report calls for "full investigations of the various, serious charges raised in this study."
There is no denying that under Bellamy—a former investment banker, politician, president of the New York City Council and later director of the Peace Corps—UNICEF has shifted gears and added a sharper edge to its image with reports on sexual abuse and other often taboo subjects. She has also joined with the heads of other U.N. agencies in advocating, for example, more help for refugee women who are sexually assaulted, including the provision of a "morning after" pill for rape victims.
While UNICEF still does monumental work in inoculating, feeding and otherwise caring for children's basic needs, it is also promoting children's rights and women's rights more insistently, arguing that without healthy, educated women, children will continue to suffer helplessly in the poorest nations on Earth. This has drawn criticism from several other quarters outside and inside the agency, where Bellamy's management style has not always been collegial, according to some staff members. Recently the British medical journal The Lancet published a series of articles on the growing number of preventable childhood deaths worldwide, which left the impression among some readers that UNICEF needs to redirect emphasis to its traditional mission of child survival.
Bellamy's appointment in 1995 by former U.N. Secretary General Boutros Boutros-Ghali was itself surrounded by some controversy. Boutros-Ghali, seeking to fill the job after the death of the legendary James Grant, asked for female nominees. The Clinton administration nominated a man. The secretary general was on the verge of appointing a European woman when Washington suddenly produced five women's names, and Bellamy was chosen. Secretary General Kofi Annan, who has praised her gutsy approach, reappointed her to a second five-year term in 2000.
Bellamy has said repeatedly that the world has changed, and so has thinking about why some countries seem predestined to fail. It is now accepted in most institutions, among them the World Bank and numerous private aid agencies, that without an improvement in women's lives, birth rates will continue to soar, children will not go to school, childhood disease will persist and younger and younger children, living in the most destructive poverty, will be vulnerable to abuses of all kinds, including slave labor and HIV-AIDS infection through forced sex. This is not conducive to either a healthier childhood or a stronger nation. Women with more schooling have fewer children.
In Cambodia, where I lived for part of this year, the police raided a Phnom Penh brothel in April and found girls as young as 5 to 10 years old. Such children, sometimes boys as well as girls, are victims of the myth that sex with a prepubescent child can prevent, or cure, AIDS. For millions of girls and boys like these in poor countries, there is no childhood.
The Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute, noting the appearance of frank and explicit educational materials about sex in UNICEF-supported programs around the world and a greater emphasis on the education of girls, who are least likely to go to school, worries that "UNICEF has moved beyond such simple, and universally acceptable, programs like the provision of iodized salt and immunizations." The report asks, "Are these new issues worthy of UNICEF?"
Adrienne Germain, president of the International Women's Health Coalition in New York, an umbrella organization for women's health groups in the developing world, has an answer to that question. UNICEF's issues are new because there are new challenges. "What stuns me about this report is the utter lack of regard for women's reality and girls' reality, even to the extent of resenting UNICEF's effort to try to increase girls' access to schooling," she said in an interview.
"Increasingly what's been revealed is the extent to which young girls are exposed to sexual violence and coercion in any number of countries across sub-Saharan Africa and also South Asia," said Germain, a former Ford Foundation official in Bangladesh with long experience in South Asia as well as Africa and Latin America.
One form this coercion takes is child marriage, "where a girl is married off sometimes even before puberty and there is really no informed consent whatsoever," she said. "She goes into a household where she is totally controlled, knowing nothing about sexuality and certainly not about contraception, and being forced to produce as soon as possible, preferably a son. That whole dynamic affects millions of girls."
Often the death of an older husband turns the girl into family chattel to be given away to another male relative or sold into bonded labor or a brothel procurer. Many widowed or abandoned girls are just driven out to fend for themselves, possessing no property or skills.
"Another pattern is poverty, where either the parents sell the girl children into prostitution or girls themselves engage in transactional sex in order to get school fees or even the trinkets that they want, or a ride to school," Germain said. "In 1986 I first learned that at the universities in Nigeria, where it's really only the upper classes that go, the economy was in such a state that it had become a common practice for girls to have sugar daddies in order to get their tuition paid."
More than a decade of vicious civil ethnic conflict, where rape and other forms of sexual violence have become weapons of war, has added more tragedy to many overstressed, impoverished societies. "Everywhere you look, you see this," Germain said. She added that the World Health Organization now estimates that one out of every three women will experience physical and usually sexual violence in her lifetime. "This pervasive setting of coercion, of violence, of poverty leads men to prey on girls," she said.
When the UNFPA lost its $34 million in U.S. contributions last year, two women decided that the campaign to undercut the work of the United Nations in the third world in the name of an ill-informed moral posture had to be countered. The two, Lois Abraham, a lawyer from Arizona, and Jane Roberts, a French linguist and teacher in California, decided to find 34 million Americans willing to give $1 each. Within months, they had raised the first $1 million, and money is still coming in, though $34 million is still far away.
It's the thought that counts, said UNFPA head Thoraya Obaid. For her, it was comforting news that at the grassroots, Americans did care. UNICEF, with a large American support group, may find itself having to make the same point.
Click on a link below for more stories on PCOL
| || Top Discussion Stories|
|A Modest Proposal|
Read the op-ed by John Coyne on how to expand and revitalize the NPCA and what you can do to help.
|Peace Corps Charter|
Read about the new Peace Corps bill going through Congress. Compare the Senate and House versions of the bill here.
|A Volunteer's Courage|
After Sara Evans was assaulted she left the Peace Corps and returned to the United States. But her ordeal was only beginning.
|The Fourth Goal|
Read about Sargent Shriver's Fourth Goal for the Peace Corps. His original speech at Yale about the Peace Corps in the 21st Century is here.
|The Numbers Game|
Double the Peace Corps - but maintain the quality of the programs and the volunteer experience.
...in Volunteer services. Read our exclusive story on what needs to be done to support volunteers and reduce attrition rates.
|The Lariam Files|
Read about the anti-malarial drug thousands of volunteers have taken - and its potential side effects.
Senator Norm Coleman is a strong supporter of Bush's full $359M budget request but wants greater accountability from the Peace Corps. Read why.
|Protest at the Peace Corps|
Do volunteers and staff retain first amendment rights while working in the Peace Corps. Join the discussion.
Read how 1,800 RPCVs organized to place two half-page ads in the New York Times.
|PC is "truly hardcore"|
A Marine Sergeant visited his daughter who is serving in Nicaragua. Read what he says about the Peace Corps.
|RPCVs honor Vaughn|
Returned Volunteers met to honor and listen to the wisdom of Peace Corps legend Jack Vaughn.
Some postings on Peace Corps Online are provided to the individual members of this group without permission of the copyright owner for the non-profit purposes of criticism, comment, education, scholarship, and research under the "Fair Use" provisions of U.S. Government copyright laws and they may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owner. Peace Corps Online does not vouch for the accuracy of the content of the postings, which is the sole responsibility of the copyright holder.
This story has been posted in the following forums: : Headlines; Peace Corps Directors - Bellamy; United Nations; Unicef