2011.10.04: October 4, 2011: Oral Testimony of Chuck Ludlam In Opposition to H.R. 854 Legislation to Authorize a Peace Corps Monument to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands
Peace Corps Online:
Directory:
Senegal:
Peace Corps Senegal :
Peace Corps Senegal: Newest Stories:
2011.10.04: October 4, 2011: Testimony of Chuck Ludlam In Opposition to H.R. 854 Legislation to Authorize a Peace Corps Monument to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands :
2011.10.04: October 4, 2011: Oral Testimony of Chuck Ludlam In Opposition to H.R. 854 Legislation to Authorize a Peace Corps Monument to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands
Oral Testimony of Chuck Ludlam In Opposition to H.R. 854 Legislation to Authorize a Peace Corps Monument to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands
"Adherence to the principle of letting history be the judge is precisely why the Commemorative Works Act sets a 25-year rule. The 20/20 expose focused on a Peace Corps Volunteer who was murdered by Peace Corps Staff because the Volunteer was a whistle blower. She was murdered in March of 2009, after President Obama took office. This murder arose as much from policies at Peace Corps Headquarters as from the situation in Benin. That's why it presents an existential threat to the Peace Corps. This murder was NOT an isolated or unforeseeable incident. The 20/20 expose also highlighted the despicable ways in which the Peace Corps has mistreated Volunteers who have been raped or sexually assaulted. I urge you to watch the harrowing tape of the Volunteers' testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on May 11 of this year. To authorize this Monument would be to ignore these scandals and imply that they are meaningless and irrelevant. Before my retirement in 2005, I served on the staff of Congressional committees over a 40 year period. If I were serving on your staff today, my advice would to be that given these scandals, don't touch the Peace Corps with a 10 foot pole."
Oral Testimony of Chuck Ludlam In Opposition to H.R. 854 Legislation to Authorize a Peace Corps Monument to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands
Oral Testimony: Chuck Ludlam
Chairman Bishop and Members of the Subcommittee.
Let me make four points.
First, more important than listening to what I have to say would be viewing the ABC 20/20 report of its investigation into epic scandals in the Peace Corps.
The Subcommittee should let these scandals run their course.
It should be wary of authorizing a Monument that would, in effect, enable the Peace Corps to "change the subject" and gloss over these unresolved scandals.
I am aware of at least three more installments in these scandals that may become public in the coming months.
If the Subcommittee authorizes this Monument, it risks being blind-sided by upcoming developments.
Over a period of years, we will have the verdict of history regarding the dimensions and meaning of all this.
Adherence to the principle of letting history be the judge is precisely why the Commemorative Works Act sets a 25-year rule.
The 20/20 expose focused on a Peace Corps Volunteer who was murdered by Peace Corps Staff because the Volunteer was a whistle blower.
She was murdered in March of 2009, after President Obama took office.
This murder arose as much from policies at Peace Corps Headquarters as from the situation in Benin.
That's why it presents an existential threat to the Peace Corps.
This murder was NOT an isolated or unforeseeable incident.
The 20/20 expose also highlighted the despicable ways in which the Peace Corps has mistreated Volunteers who have been raped or sexually assaulted.
I urge you to watch the harrowing tape of the Volunteers' testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on May 11 of this year.
To authorize this Monument would be to ignore these scandals and imply that they are meaningless and irrelevant.
Before my retirement in 2005, I served on the staff of Congressional committees over a 40 year period.
If I were serving on your staff today, my advice would to be that given these scandals, don't touch the Peace Corps with a 10 foot pole.
Second, in terms of the Commemorative Works Act, the sponsors argue that the Peace Corps satisfies the 25-year rule because it was founded more than 25 years ago.
If that were true, the Subcommittee could today authorize a monument to President Reagan because he was born in 1911.
This is the second time the NPCA has attempted to evade the 25-year rule.
In 1987 NPCA secured authorization for a National Peace Garden to be located at Haines Point.
Back then NPCA believed that any monument that mentioned the Peace Corps or Peace Corps Volunteers would violate the 25-year rule.
So it proposed a Peace Garden instead.
Yet today NPCA is pushing a monument that explicitly mentions the Peace Corps and Peace Corps Volunteers.
NPCA is playing both ends against the middle.
The Park Service is rightfully concerned about authorizing Mall monuments to ideals.
The ongoing scandals show what the Peace Corps ideals mean in practice today.
It would be sadly ironic if the first Mall monument to American volunteerism glorified a bureaucrat run volunteer program that costs some $50,000 per year per Volunteer.
This Monument would, in effect, give the good housing keeping seal of approval to an existing government agency that comes back each year to the Congress for authorizations and appropriations.
From my service on the Board of NPCA, I know that this monument is intended to support its lobbying effort to increase Peace Corps appropriations and fight against unwanted changes in the Peace Corps authorization.
The Subcommittee should not be a party to an NPCA strategy to use this Monument to sandbag or influence other Committees on the Hill regarding the Peace Corps.
This Monument would, in effect, endorse a government spending program at a time when government spending is rightfully seen as excessive.
What are you going to say on the House Floor if a fiscally responsible Member asks why you are authorizing a monument to government spending?
This Monument is also, in effect, a second monument to President John F. Kennedy. One monument per President is sufficient.
Third, the Peace Corps is one of the worst managed agencies of the government.
In 35 countries the early-quit rate among Volunteers has exceeded 40%. Volunteers are talking with their feet.
The Peace Corps surveys of the Volunteers reveal that perhaps only 15 of the 75 country programs are well managed.
Finally, what in the world would this Monument mean over the coming decades if additional scandals arise or if the Peace Corps becomes obsolete or dies?
What would we do with an obsolete and embarrassing Mall monument?
Finally, the hallmarks of Volunteers are modesty and humility. But this Monument is all about self congratulation and ego. We find the idea of a Monument to our service to be an embarrassment.
Thank you again for inviting me to testify. I am happy to answer your questions.
Links to Related Topics (Tags):
Headlines: October, 2011; Peace Corps Senegal; Directory of Senegal RPCVs; Messages and Announcements for Senegal RPCVs; Congress; Legislation; National Peace Corps Association (NPCA); Speaking Out; Safety and Security of Volunteers
When this story was posted in October 2011, this was on the front page of PCOL:
Peace Corps Online The Independent News Forum serving Returned Peace Corps Volunteers
| Peace Corps Featured at Smithsonian Take a look at our photo essay of Peace Corps' featured program at the 2011 Smithsonian Folklife Festival on the National Mall in Washington DC to see how the festival showcased the work of Peace Corps volunteers in economic development and income generation; ways volunteers have helped support local groups to help educate communities; and food and cooking traditions that have played a role in the Peace Corps experience. New: Enjoy photos from the second week of the exposition. |
| Peace Corps: The Next Fifty Years As we move into the Peace Corps' second fifty years, what single improvement would most benefit the mission of the Peace Corps? Read our op-ed about the creation of a private charitable non-profit corporation, independent of the US government, whose focus would be to provide support and funding for third goal activities. Returned Volunteers need President Obama to support the enabling legislation, already written and vetted, to create the Peace Corps Foundation. RPCVs will do the rest. |
| How Volunteers Remember Sarge As the Peace Corps' Founding Director Sargent Shriver laid the foundations for the most lasting accomplishment of the Kennedy presidency. Shriver spoke to returned volunteers at the Peace Vigil at Lincoln Memorial in September, 2001 for the Peace Corps 40th. "The challenge I believe is simple - simple to express but difficult to fulfill. That challenge is expressed in these words: PCV's - stay as you are. Be servants of peace. Work at home as you have worked abroad. Humbly, persistently, intelligently. Weep with those who are sorrowful, Care for those who are sick. Serve your wives, serve your husbands, serve your families, serve your neighbors, serve your cities, serve the poor, join others who also serve," said Shriver. "Serve, Serve, Serve. That's the answer, that's the objective, that's the challenge." |
Read the stories and leave your comments.
Some postings on Peace Corps Online are provided to the individual members of this group without permission of the copyright owner for the non-profit purposes of criticism, comment, education, scholarship, and research under the "Fair Use" provisions of U.S. Government copyright laws and they may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owner. Peace Corps Online does not vouch for the accuracy of the content of the postings, which is the sole responsibility of the copyright holder.
Story Source: Peace Corps Worldwide
This story has been posted in the following forums: : Headlines; COS - Senegal; Congress; Legislation; NPCA; Monument; Speaking Out; Safety
PCOL47446
34