| Paid Vacations in the Third World?|
Retired diplomat Peter Rice has written a letter to the Wall Street Journal stating that Peace Corps "is really just a U.S. government program for paid vacations in the Third World." Director Vasquez has responded that "the small stipend volunteers receive during their two years of service is more than returned in the understanding fostered in communities throughout the world and here at home." What do RPCVs think?
|By Admin1 (admin) (ppp-70-245-110-11.dsl.okcyok.swbell.net - 18.104.22.168) on Friday, February 10, 2006 - 6:08 pm: Edit Post|
Peter Rice says: My view of the Peace Corps is that it is really just a U.S. government program for paid vacations in the Third World
"While stationed in our embassy in the Philippines, I had some contact with the Peace Corps there. The group had about 65 volunteers, each paid about $10,000 a year, in addition to 69 local-hire full-time employees and one full-time career American. The typical Peace Corps volunteer served two years, but was in country only about 20 months and typically spent four to six months learning the local language and ways. The volunteers were productive for only about 14 months. But even their tiny salary (by U.S. standards) of about $20,000 for two years would have hired equally qualified, locally educated workers for five years."
Peter Rice says: My view of the Peace Corps is that it is really just a U.S. government program for paid vacations in the Third World
Third World Aid: Send Money, Not Your Kids
January 26, 2006; Page A11
Your article "Kids & Money: Do Service Trips Make Sense?1" (The Journal Report, Jan. 16) didn't question whether the $7,500 spent by an American family to send their child to the Third World to help the starving masses would have done vastly more good if it had been donated to a charity in that Third World country.
I am a retired American diplomat and have spent some time in the Third World and have questioned the value of money spent to help the needy. My last overseas assignment was in New Delhi from 1997 to 1999. I remember an email exchange with a parent who wanted to pay for his kid to come empty bed pans in one of Mother Teresa's orphanages. I told him that for the same money he would spend to send the kid to India to work one month, the orphanage could hire either a local worker who spoke the language to do the same work, and do it better, for 20 years or a local full-time physician for two years.
While stationed in our embassy in the Philippines, I had some contact with the Peace Corps there. The group had about 65 volunteers, each paid about $10,000 a year, in addition to 69 local-hire full-time employees and one full-time career American. The typical Peace Corps volunteer served two years, but was in country only about 20 months and typically spent four to six months learning the local language and ways. The volunteers were productive for only about 14 months. But even their tiny salary (by U.S. standards) of about $20,000 for two years would have hired equally qualified, locally educated workers for five years.
When the Peace Corps was created in the early 1960s there was a great shortage of educated people in the Third World. The opposite is true now, with our "volunteers" taking jobs away from the many college-educated local workers who have no hope of finding jobs and who would work for one-fourth or one-half or one-tenth the small salary of Peace Corps volunteers.
My view of the Peace Corps is that it is really just a U.S. government program for paid vacations in the Third World.
When this story was posted in February 2006, this was on the front page of PCOL:
Read the stories and leave your comments.
Peace Corps Online The Independent News Forum serving Returned Peace Corps Volunteers
Top Stories: February 2, 2006
Al Kamen writes: Rice to redeploy diplomats 20 Jan
Peace Corps mourns the Loss of Volunteer Tessa Horan 1 Feb
RPCV pursues dreams in America's Heartland 1 Feb
Sargent Shriver documentary to be shown in LA 30 Jan
W. Frank Fountain is new board chairman of Africare 27 Jan
Abbey Brown writes about acid attacks in Bangladesh 26 Jan
Christopher Hill Sees Ray of Hope in N.Korea Standoff 26 Jan
Jeffrey Smit writes on one man diplomatic outposts 25 Jan
Joe Blatchford's ACCION and microfinance 24 Jan
James Rupert writes: A calculated risk in Pakistan 23 Jan
Sam Farr rips conservative immigration bill 21 Jan
Americans campaign for PC to return to Sierra Leone 20 Jan
Kinky Friedman supports Gay Marriage 20 Jan
Margaret Krome writes on Women leaders 18 Jan
James Walsh leads bipartisan US delegation to Ireland 17 Jan
Mark Schneider writes on Elections and Beyond in Haiti 16 Jan
Robert Blackwill on a "serious setback" in US-India relations 13 Jan
Kevin Quigley writes on PC and U.S. Image Abroad 13 Jan
Emily Metzloff rides bicycle 3,100 miles from Honduras 9 Jan
Charles Brennick starts operation InterConnection 9 Jan
Lee Fisher tells story of Pablo Morillo 7 Jan
Nancy Wallace writes: Was PC a CIA front after all? 4 Jan
RPCV admits to abuse while in Peace Corps
Timothy Ronald Obert has pleaded guilty to sexually abusing a minor in Costa Rica while serving there as a Peace Corps volunteer. "The Peace Corps has a zero tolerance policy for misconduct that violates the law or standards of conduct established by the Peace Corps," said Peace Corps Director Gaddi H. Vasquez. Could inadequate screening have been partly to blame? Mr. Obert's resume, which he had submitted to the Peace Corps in support of his application to become a Peace Corps Volunteer, showed that he had repeatedly sought and obtained positions working with underprivileged children. Read what RPCVs have to say about this case.
Military Option sparks concerns
The U.S. military, struggling to fill its voluntary ranks, is allowing recruits to meet part of their reserve military obligations after active duty by serving in the Peace Corps. Read why there is opposition to the program among RPCVs. Director Vasquez says the agency has a long history of accepting qualified applicants who are in inactive military status. John Coyne says "Not only no, but hell no!" and RPCV Chris Matthews leads the debate on "Hardball." Avi Spiegel says Peace Corps is not the place for soldiers while Coleman McCarthy says to Welcome Soldiers to the Peace Corps. Read our poll results. Latest: Congress passed a bill on December 22 including language to remove Peace Corps from the National Call to Service (NCS) military recruitment program
Why blurring the lines puts PCVs in danger
When the National Call to Service legislation was amended to include Peace Corps in December of 2002, this country had not yet invaded Iraq and was not in prolonged military engagement in the Middle East, as it is now. Read the story of how one volunteer spent three years in captivity from 1976 to 1980 as the hostage of a insurrection group in Colombia in Joanne Marie Roll's op-ed on why this legislation may put soldier/PCVs in the same kind of danger. Latest: Read the ongoing dialog on the subject.
PC establishes awards for top Volunteers
Gaddi H. Vasquez has established the Kennedy Service Awards to honor the hard work and service of two current Peace Corps Volunteers, two returned Peace Corps Volunteers, and two Peace Corps staff members. The award to currently serving volunteers will be based on a demonstration of impact, sustainability, creativity, and catalytic effect. Submit your nominations by December 9.
Robert F. Kennedy - 80th anniversary of his birth
"Few men are willing to brave the disapproval of their fellows, the censure of their colleagues, the wrath of their society. Moral courage is a rarer commodity than bravery in battle or great intelligence. Yet it is the one essential, vital quality for those who seek to change the world which yields most painfully to change."
Peace Corps at highest Census in 30 years
Congratulations to the Peace Corps for the highest number of volunteers in 30 years with 7,810 volunteers serving in 71 posts across the globe. Of course, the President's proposal to double the Peace Corps to 15,000 volunteers made in his State of the Union Address in 2002 is now a long forgotten dream. With deficits in federal spending stretching far off into the future, any substantive increase in the number of volunteers will have to wait for new approaches to funding and for a new administration. Choose your candidate and start working for him or her now.
The Peace Corps Library
Peace Corps Online is proud to announce that the Peace Corps Library is now available online. With over 30,000 index entries in 500 categories, this is the largest collection of Peace Corps related stories in the world. From Acting to Zucchini, you can find hundreds of stories about what RPCVs with your same interests or from your Country of Service are doing today. If you have a web site, support the "Peace Corps Library" and link to it today.
Friends of the Peace Corps 170,000 strong
170,000 is a very special number for the RPCV community - it's the number of Volunteers who have served in the Peace Corps since 1961. It's also a number that is very special to us because March is the first month since our founding in January, 2001 that our readership has exceeded 170,000. And while we know that not everyone who comes to this site is an RPCV, they are all "Friends of the Peace Corps." Thanks everybody for making PCOL your source of news for the Returned Volunteer community.
|By MajorOz (22.214.171.124.dyn.centurytel.net - 126.96.36.199) on Monday, February 13, 2006 - 7:22 pm: Edit Post|
How dare he insult our dedicated dilettantes. Typical for a Republican to trash the generous liberal arts graduates who just want to hug everyone and make the world a better place.
The effrontery of it.
|By Voter Fraud for Harris (ca07-ch01-bl12.va-ashburn0.sa.earthlink.net - 188.8.131.52) on Saturday, March 04, 2006 - 11:44 pm: Edit Post|
I see your in the picture with the lady who should be jail for election fraud. Maybe she will win the Congressional race through ballot box stuffing.
You know, Rice the Dub, maybe you should have washed those bed pans at the orphanage. How much did you make as a Diplomat to make these sweeping budget cutting remarks about the 10,000 dollar volunteer? John Kennedy's ambassador to India and Mrs. Kennedy's visit to India is still remembered by Indians around the world. How were you remembered there? I don't recall much mention of your great strides in Indian affairs. Perhaps, I wasn't paying attention, maybe you help transport arms of something negative like that. Most likely.
Club Med, you never lived in the village without sercurity or have had to be self sufficent in your life, I bet. You sound like the snotty kid you must have been.
Taking jobs away from Indians cuts both ways, Mr. Dub, look at the opportunities Indians have had here are taking advantage of here. Good for them.
So, why isn't good if a volunteer wants to do good and not work in a high tech field.
That person as a volunteer will make more relationships and better relationships for the US than you could ever dream of making when you were a so called diolomat/arms dealer.
|By Helene Dudley (184.108.40.206) on Thursday, March 09, 2006 - 3:10 pm: Edit Post|
In international relations, Peace Corps provides the 'biggest bang for the buck.' Not only do PCVs put a very human and accessible face on America, but volunteers go on to staff international agencies and businesses, contributing to a better informed, more culturally sensitive and therefore more effective American workforce. I served in the 60's and the 90's and would happily educate Mr. Rice as to the variety of ways in which PCVs benefitted their host countries as well as the United States. He couldn't be more wrong.
Helene of Colombia, Albania/Slovakia
|By Anonymous (magid.com - 220.127.116.11) on Monday, March 13, 2006 - 10:49 am: Edit Post|
Quick disclaimer - I'm not a Corps member - though I've considered it. That fact, however, might actually enhance my opinion, as I'm clearly not a Peace Corps apologist or flunkie.
Peter Rice apparently missed the "Peace" in "Peace Corps" - it's not the "Efficiency Corps", nor the "Give More Money to Third World Countries Corps". To my humble (or not so?) estimation, the PC is about human beings reaching out to other human beings across the division lines of political, national and geographic boundaries.
This kind of goodwill cannot be built upon foundations of cold efficiency - nor by tossing handfuls of cash at people. Such is the kind of goodwill that grows in local communities when people come together to raise a barn, or celebrate a birth, or simply share time together. It's not simply about digging a well or a trench, or whatever other task a Corps member helps with. It's also about creating a global community, enhancing cultural tolerance and seeding basic human kindness. Certainly a local person could do the job quicker - but that would totally bypass the invaluable bonds that come from such shared effort.
Such bonds have become ever more vital in a world where the role of the United States - real or percieved - as a global watchdog and police-force grows everyday. That there are entire faces of foreign cultures that find us so abhorrent that they would consider our extermination as good an outcome as any, is telling. Are such attitudes ignorant? Yes. Are they justified? Never. Are they understandable? Perhaps. The fact is, they do exist.
So, if Peter Rice believes that the PC is simply about whether a local person could do the job better than a Corps member, then he's clearly, and desperately, in need of some time in the Corps himself.
And, finally, who in their right mind would call $10k for "14 months of productive work", living in sub-standard conditions (which they are for any average American) a "vacation"? When Mr. Rice has forgone his undoubtably larger salary to work as hard as any average Corps member, and live for that long in (not "among" - in) those conditions, then I'll start to listen more favorably to his opinions.
|By Mark Treuenfels (24-176-162-158.static.snlo.ca.charter.com - 18.104.22.168) on Monday, March 13, 2006 - 11:58 am: Edit Post|
I served in Jamaica- I can understand why someone who's never been there could envision a lovely idyllic island paradise. I would like to invite Mister Rice to come visit the site I 'vacationed' in for two years. If he can't make the comittment, I can send photos. I think it would shock him. Might bring him to his senses.
|By John C - Benin 94-96 (c-24-34-55-175.hsd1.ma.comcast.net - 22.214.171.124) on Monday, March 13, 2006 - 10:20 pm: Edit Post|
One has to wonder if Mr. Rice was a diplomat and not an accountant...
Peace Corps Volunteers project an image of America to the world that is a sorely-needed antidote to the gun-toting crusaders that are in control of the White House today.
For what it costs to purchase a dozen cruise missiles, we can help 8,000 volunteers demonstrate to the world that our country really does care about them, AND increase the ranks of U.S. government officials who have a sophisticated understanding of foreign cultures.
Not a bad value at all.
|By Anonymous (c-69-250-124-119.hsd1.md.comcast.net - 126.96.36.199) on Monday, March 27, 2006 - 3:48 pm: Edit Post|
As a volunteer, I only received a living allowance of $100/month. So, for a total of $2,400 in 2 years I was able to help my village finish 2 classrooms for a growing school. I know another volunteer who helped bring piped water into a town that had none. I could go on about the variety of projects. I would not just donate money to anyone in a developing country. Supporting a Peace Corps Volunteer's project puts the money into responsible hands. More often than not, donated monies are 'chopped', or stolen, by those locals working on projects and thus the projects only become half completed. Then the community complains that they need more money to finish the project. Throwing money at them solves nothing. Having people working with them side by side teaching them how to use their resources in a more productive way does.
Also, many volunteers work in areas of these countries where no local wants to work. They are in sore need of aid in the form of bodies willing to live and work in remote villages while the educated locals are moving to the cities or to foreign countries. I once met a man in a regional capital who said that years ago, when he was in senior secondary school, he was taught by a Peace Corps Volunteer. He said he was the only one from his school in about 10 years to go to university and that he owed it to that volunteer. Our work is not always visible in the 2 or more years we spend as volunteers. Maybe we never observe the results of our work, but future generations will.
As for a vacation, it was. A vacation from America. An opportunity to experience the way most of the world lives. Getting malaria and worms and odd skin 'distings' were a real treat. Especially when you have to travel over an hour on a dirt road, maybe only on a market day, to get to the nearest care facility and then finally be able to call Peace Corps headquarters, if there were phones and they were working, to tell them about it. Worrying about being a target for robbery or other crimes or harassments just because you are white and viewed as rich was unnerving at times. Sometimes, even, it was safer to say that you were Canadian than to admitting to being American. Through all of this and I don't think I can honestly say that I know one volunteer who would trade this experience for the world.
And of course we had our parties. Getting together with other volunteers and discussing life in whichever country among your own is a necessity in being able to continue the work you are doing. You need that time to vent and to brainstorm and relax. You are in a different culture, but sometimes you need to be with other Americans who are experiencing the same things.