2006.02.19: February 19, 2006: Headlines: Aid: Times Online: Bono responds to Critics
Peace Corps Online:
Special Report: RPCV Paul Theroux:
Paul Theroux: Archived Stories:
December 15, 2005: Headlines: COS - Malawi: Writing - Malawi: Speaking Out: New York Times: Paul Theroux says "It seems to have been Africa's fate to become a theater of empty talk and public gestures." :
2006.02.19: February 19, 2006: Headlines: Aid: Times Online: Bono responds to Critics
Bono responds to Critics
Yet he certainly has his critics. Paul Theroux, the author, believes him deluded for sending money to corrupt African governments. Having known him for 26 years, even I have doubts about what he is trying to achieve. I think he sees his cause with the eyes of love, and such lofty ambitions are mostly wishful thinking. “Our critics — I’ve met them in rock’n’roll in the early years and they’re the same people: cranks carping from the sidelines. A lot of them wouldn’t know what to do if they were on the field. They’re the party who will always be in opposition so they’ll never have to take responsibility for decisions because they know they’ll never be able to implement them. We get hits from the left, we get hits from the right, but in the end, every year, the world’s poor are better off for our presence.”
Bono responds to Critics
Michka Assayas meets Bono
I’m going back to my day job, honest
I first met Bono in 1980. I had come over from Paris to interview a score of new bands but nobody made an impression on me like he did. He was totally unreserved, unlike most of the British new wave, bouncing around, eyes darting, talking fast and full of energy. He was the first Irishman I ever met. Only later did I realise that his bonhomie was a national trait.
At that time U2 were sharing a tiny flat in Collingham Gardens in London that resembled the sort of spartan lodgings a cold war spy might have used. We crammed into the small kitchen, drank tea and talked politics, philosophy and music. We were young and pretentious, but even then Bono had a capacity to get the measure of a man in seconds. It’s a skill that has stood him in good stead.
With hindsight, was it inevitable that this skinny 20-year-old with his jeans and frizzy hair would go on to sell 130m records, campaign on African debt, gain the ear of presidents and prime ministers and even get nominated for the Nobel peace prize? Perhaps. Bono always thought big.
Although we met a few times over the years (I once tried to take him to Notre Dame but got lost), when I turned up in Dublin to interview Bono in 1997 we had not seen one another for more than a decade. The spartan lodgings were long gone; this time our rendezvous was at a lavish recording studio after which we adjourned to the pub. Superfame sat easy on his shoulders, perhaps because, as he says nowadays: “Celebrity is currency and I want to spend mine well.”
But something about Bono had changed. The expansive clown-like young man I had first met — born Paul David Hewson in Ballymun, Dublin, to a Protestant mother and a Catholic father — had become a little more hidden, more distant, taking greater care with his words. His stare was more focused and he scanned the room carefully. This caution, a kind of wariness, seemed to be the price of his fame. Later we decided to work on a book together (Bono on Bono, Hodder) a record of our conversations which happen every so often. This is my account of our most recent one which began with Bono singing a snatch of a John Lennon song.
I laughed at him. Didn’t he think it was a bit inappropriate to take Lennon’s part in Sgt Pepper on stage at Live 8 last year? “Oh, I don’t think like that,” he laughs right back. “I have the immodesty of foolishness. I was proud to stand in his shoes.”
Were you proud of everything that day? How about the lack of African artists on the bill? “There were a few of us worried about it,” he sighs. “Geldof gave up his life for a year working on this stuff. No sleep and a lot of grief. Some balls were going to be dropped. Most went in the back of the net. Personally, yes, I think it was a mistake not to have more African artists. There were a few of us worried about it. Bob was being protective of the ratings because the ratings, he felt, would in the end be the thing that protected Africa. I wasn’t so clear-cut, though. But it was Bob’s show . . . many African artists performed in Jo’burg that day. Most of the world cameras chose not to cover the concert there which maybe proves Bob’s point.”
I point out that the musician and local mayor Ali Farka Toure from Mali was just one African who said that he didn’t support Live 8 because he wasn’t interested in being used as a political pawn. Bono’s response? “If he doesn’t reckon Live 8 are helping his people, maybe they should rethink him being mayor.”
Last year was a colossal year for Bono, one in which he spent months away from his home near Dublin where he lives with Ali Hewson, his wife of 24 years, and their four children. For one thing, there was the 118-date world tour with U2, which 3m people saw and which earned the band $260m. Then for a couple of weeks the G8 summit propelled Africa and Bono’s crusade to the top of the geopolitical agenda.
Bono has been campaigning for Africa for the past 25 years. Last year, the Live 8 concerts that he organised with Bob Geldof and his lobbying of world leaders at the G8 summit in Gleneagles secured a $50 billion aid package. Despite sniping from some other aid agencies that it was too little, this money was the biggest success yet for Bono’s charity Data (Debt Aids Trade Africa), which he co-founded in 2002. Yet he certainly has his critics. Paul Theroux, the author, believes him deluded for sending money to corrupt African governments. Having known him for 26 years, even I have doubts about what he is trying to achieve. I think he sees his cause with the eyes of love, and such lofty ambitions are mostly wishful thinking. President Clinton was a huge fan, though. Does he get a frostier reception at Dubya’s White House?
Bono sniggers. “Well, look, I have had sour times over the Aids funding level back in 2003 when the cash was coming too slow. We had a bit of a row in the Oval Office, and even a few [months] ago we had another difference over funding for the Global Fund [the UN programme to fight Aids], but the Bush administration has funded the most extraordinarily successful Aids programme with nearly 400,000 Africans on ARVs anti-retroviral drugs].”
In the past few years Bono has won the support not only of two American presidents, but also of Vladimir Putin, Tony Blair, Kofi Annan and George Soros, the multi-millionaire. While most people’s (certainly most rock musicians’) ambitions might not include becoming the next Mother Teresa, Bono was always different, perhaps because faith has shaped his life. On the eve of U2’s world domination in 1983, he nearly quit the band over fears that the lifestyle was not compatible with his religion. Although he stayed a musician, from that point on it was obvious that music alone would never hold his entire focus.
So the fact that the Millennium Challenge Account, the US initiative for Africa which was created in early 2004 to direct funds and aid to the continent, has devoted only a fraction of what it promised must infuriate him. “I’m pissed. I’m mad, in fact, that not more has happened,” says Bono. “But still, more has happened than any could have imagined from them. Even though $400,000 is the figure [so far], over $2 billion has been set aside for Africa. We have had a heated debate about this, myself and the president. Funnily enough, he was almost as pissed off as I was.”
What did he say exactly? “He said there was no excuse. But it’s clear they had a lot on their mind. After 9/11 and entering into the war, some desks got very overcrowded. It’s not an excuse that I’m accepting but I do believe they will put it right. Even the most staunch critics of the administration’s aid development will concede that the president has tripled aid to Africa. Is it enough? No.”
Some might say that publicly denouncing the Bush administration would help his cause more than being pally with them. “I’ve been through this,” he says, exasperated. “We have had lots of rows and we have denounced the Bush administration when they have made mistakes, but we’re not placarding and throwing rotten tomatoes at people who are trebling aid to Africa.
“Our critics — I’ve met them in rock’n’roll in the early years and they’re the same people: cranks carping from the sidelines. A lot of them wouldn’t know what to do if they were on the field. They’re the party who will always be in opposition so they’ll never have to take responsibility for decisions because they know they’ll never be able to implement them. We get hits from the left, we get hits from the right, but in the end, every year, the world’s poor are better off for our presence.”
Despite the success of Gleneagles and progress in the fight against Aids and malaria, it still seems as if fair trade for Africa is not on any rich country’s agenda. On this issue he must surely concede failure?
“Look, we’ve made progress on debt and aid, and that must be celebrated,” he says quickly. “Trade will be an epic, long-term battle. France is one of the biggest problems in reaching a trade deal. People are worried that dismantling the common agricultural policy [CAP] in Europe would really affect small French farmers. We don’t think it should. The giant corporate farmers in America and Europe are receiving most of the subsidies. These subsidies are cruel to a farmer in the developing world who is trying to compete.”
Naturally, he remains positive though. At the moment the One Campaign, aiming to sign up Americans to fight the African Aids crisis and extreme poverty, gathers apace. “We’ve got others coming through now: Angelina Jolie, George Clooney, Brad Pitt. It’s the movement that will stop the tin-cupping [and] give us real political muscle. By 2008, the year of the next [American] election, I am assured that there will be 5m Americans, which makes us bigger than the National Rifle Association.”
He laughs, enjoying the thought. “Now, the NRA, if you mess with them, they go after you.”
Last year’s exertions have taken their toll. For my money, Bono sounds tired. His back has been giving him problems on tour, the consequence of a punishing schedule and age, too, perhaps. It was, he says, “a very difficult year, going into G8 and Live 8. There was very little sleep. There was a cost there.
“I’ll tell you this, I am parched for time to spend writing and time spent with the band. This year I really want to just lose myself more in the music and I will have to have a lower profile.”
That won’t be difficult.
© Michka Assayas 2006
When this story was posted in March 2006, this was on the front page of PCOL:
Peace Corps Online The Independent News Forum serving Returned Peace Corps Volunteers
| History of the Peace Corps|
PCOL is proud to announce that Phase One of the "History of the Peace Corps" is now available online. This installment includes over 5,000 pages of primary source documents from the archives of the Peace Corps including every issue of "Peace Corps News," "Peace Corps Times," "Peace Corps Volunteer," "Action Update," and every annual report of the Peace Corps to Congress since 1961. "Ask Not" is an ongoing project. Read how you can help.
| The Peace Corps Library|
The Peace Corps Library is now available online with over 40,000 index entries in 500 categories. Looking for a Returned Volunteer? Check our RPCV Directory. New: Sign up to receive PCOL Magazine, our free Monthly Magazine by email. Like to keep up with Peace Corps news as it happens? Sign up to recieve a daily summary of Peace Corps stories from around the world.
| Peace Corps suspends program in Bangladesh|
Peace Corps Director Gaddi H. Vasquez announced the suspension of the Peace Corps program in Bangladesh on March 15. The safety and security of volunteers is the number one priority of the Peace Corps. Therefore, all Peace Corps volunteers serving in Bangladesh have safely left the country. More than 280 Peace Corps volunteers have served in Bangladesh since the program opened in November 1998. Latest: What other newspapers say.
| Invitee re-assigned after inflammatory remarks|
The Peace Corps has pulled the invitation to Derek Volkart to join the Morocco Training Program and offered him a position in the Pacific instead after officials read an article in which he stated that his decision to join the Peace Corps was in "response to our current fascist government." RPCV Lew Nash says that "If Derek Volkart spoke his mind as freely in Morocco about the Moroccan monarchy it could cause major problems for himself and other Peace Corps volunteers." Latest: The Ashland Daily Tidings has issued a request for all Peace Corps communications on the case.
| Re-envision Peace Corps|
Nicholas J. Slabbert says in his article in the Harvard International Review that an imaginatively reinvented Peace Corps could powerfully promote US interests in a period when perceptions of American motives are increasingly relevant to global realignment. His study envisions a new role for the Peace Corps in five linked areas: (1) reinventing America's international profile via a new use of soft power; (2) moving from a war-defined, non-technological, reactive theory of peace to a theory of peace as a normal, proactive component of technologically advanced democracy; (3) reappraising Peace Corps as a national strategic asset whose value remains largely untapped; (4) Peace Corps as a model for the technological reinvention of government agencies for the 21st century; (5) redefining civil society as information technology society. Read the article and leave your comments.
| March 1, 1961: Keeping Kennedy's Promise|
On March 1, 1961, President John F. Kennedy issues Executive Order #10924, establishing the Peace Corps as a new agency: "Life in the Peace Corps will not be easy. There will be no salary and allowances will be at a level sufficient only to maintain health and meet basic needs. Men and women will be expected to work and live alongside the nationals of the country in which they are stationed--doing the same work, eating the same food, talking the same language. But if the life will not be easy, it will be rich and satisfying. For every young American who participates in the Peace Corps--who works in a foreign land--will know that he or she is sharing in the great common task of bringing to man that decent way of life which is the foundation of freedom and a condition of peace. "
| Paid Vacations in the Third World?|
Retired diplomat Peter Rice has written a letter to the Wall Street Journal stating that Peace Corps "is really just a U.S. government program for paid vacations in the Third World." Director Vasquez has responded that "the small stipend volunteers receive during their two years of service is more than returned in the understanding fostered in communities throughout the world and here at home." What do RPCVs think?
| RPCV admits to abuse while in Peace Corps|
Timothy Ronald Obert has pleaded guilty to sexually abusing a minor in Costa Rica while serving there as a Peace Corps volunteer. "The Peace Corps has a zero tolerance policy for misconduct that violates the law or standards of conduct established by the Peace Corps," said Peace Corps Director Gaddi H. Vasquez. Could inadequate screening have been partly to blame? Mr. Obert's resume, which he had submitted to the Peace Corps in support of his application to become a Peace Corps Volunteer, showed that he had repeatedly sought and obtained positions working with underprivileged children. Read what RPCVs have to say about this case.
| Why blurring the lines puts PCVs in danger|
When the National Call to Service legislation was amended to include Peace Corps in December of 2002, this country had not yet invaded Iraq and was not in prolonged military engagement in the Middle East, as it is now. Read the story of how one volunteer spent three years in captivity from 1976 to 1980 as the hostage of a insurrection group in Colombia in Joanne Marie Roll's op-ed on why this legislation may put soldier/PCVs in the same kind of danger. Latest: Read the ongoing dialog on the subject.
| Friends of the Peace Corps 170,000 strong|
170,000 is a very special number for the RPCV community - it's the number of Volunteers who have served in the Peace Corps since 1961. It's also a number that is very special to us because March is the first month since our founding in January, 2001 that our readership has exceeded 170,000. And while we know that not everyone who comes to this site is an RPCV, they are all "Friends of the Peace Corps." Thanks everybody for making PCOL your source of news for the Returned Volunteer community.
Read the stories and leave your comments.
Some postings on Peace Corps Online are provided to the individual members of this group without permission of the copyright owner for the non-profit purposes of criticism, comment, education, scholarship, and research under the "Fair Use" provisions of U.S. Government copyright laws and they may not be distributed further without permission of the copyright owner. Peace Corps Online does not vouch for the accuracy of the content of the postings, which is the sole responsibility of the copyright holder.
Story Source: Times Online
This story has been posted in the following forums: : Headlines; Aid